Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #194535

Re: Recipient address rejected

From Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Recipient address rejected
Date 2018-04-06 01:00 +0200
Message-ID <vBm1j-2hf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <vBl5f-1CH-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 05 Apr 2018, deloptes wrote:
> I think it was already discussed here, but I may have missed the point.
[...]
>                   The mail system
> 
> <debian-user@lists.debian.org>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said:
> 550
>     5.7.1 <debian-user@lists.debian.org>: Recipient address rejected: Mail
>     appeared to be SPAM or forged. Ask your Mail/DNS-Administrator to
> correct
>     HELO and DNS MX settings or to get removed from DNSBLs; MTA helo:
>     localhost.localdomain, MTA hostname: unknown[221.224.30.132]
> (helo/hostname
>     mismatch) (in reply to RCPT TO command)
> 

This mail is coming to bendel from 221.224.30.132, which is listed in
CBL[1] because it is part of the confiker bot net. It's also
misconfigured. It should provide a valid DNS name in the EHLO request,
ideally one whose forward and reverse match the provided IP address.

1: https://www.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi

-- 
Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com

A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless. 
 -- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Recipient address rejected deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-06 00:00 +0200
  Re: Recipient address rejected Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2018-04-06 01:00 +0200

csiph-web