Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #194535
| From | Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Recipient address rejected |
| Date | 2018-04-06 01:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vBm1j-2hf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <vBl5f-1CH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 05 Apr 2018, deloptes wrote: > I think it was already discussed here, but I may have missed the point. [...] > The mail system > > <debian-user@lists.debian.org>: host bendel.debian.org[82.195.75.100] said: > 550 > 5.7.1 <debian-user@lists.debian.org>: Recipient address rejected: Mail > appeared to be SPAM or forged. Ask your Mail/DNS-Administrator to > correct > HELO and DNS MX settings or to get removed from DNSBLs; MTA helo: > localhost.localdomain, MTA hostname: unknown[221.224.30.132] > (helo/hostname > mismatch) (in reply to RCPT TO command) > This mail is coming to bendel from 221.224.30.132, which is listed in CBL[1] because it is part of the confiker bot net. It's also misconfigured. It should provide a valid DNS name in the EHLO request, ideally one whose forward and reverse match the provided IP address. 1: https://www.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless. -- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Recipient address rejected deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-06 00:00 +0200 Re: Recipient address rejected Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2018-04-06 01:00 +0200
csiph-web