Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14161

Re: A PIP classification scheme is needed (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore])

Show all headers | View raw

The PIP 903: Partial strings wasn't
so successful yet. Although pursued by
two Prolog systems, Scryer Prolog

and Trealla Prolog, the results are
not a banger performance wise. Could
have to do with some DCG pipe dreams:

/* Scryer Prolog 0.9.4-135 */
?- time((between(1,1000,_), data(X), json_chars(Y,X,[]), fail; true)).
    % CPU time: 0.283s, 2_506_022 inferences
    true.

/* Trealla Prolog 2.55.19 */
?- time((between(1,1000,_), data(X), json_chars(Y,X,[]), fail; true)).
% Time elapsed 0.235s, 2568003 Inferences, 10.937 MLips
    true.

/* Dogelog Player for Java 1.2.1 */
?- time((between(1,1000,_), data(X), json_atom(Y,X), fail; true)).
% Zeit 40 ms, GC 0 ms, Lips 12502725, Uhr 13.08.2024 08:43
true.

/* SWI-Prolog 9.3.8 */
?- time((between(1,1000,_), data(X), atom_json_term(X,Y,[]), fail; true)).
% 44,998 inferences, 0.016 CPU in 0.006 seconds (281% CPU, 2879872 Lips)
true.

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> .
> Hi,
> 
> SARS-CoV-2 variant are classified as variant under
> monitoring (VUM), variant of interest (VOI)
> and variant of concern (VOC).
> 
> How would we classify PIPs. Here is a list:
> 
> - PIP 701: Tasks
> Stackfull and stackless cooperative cooroutines.
> 
> - PIP 702: Events
> An event loop to “asyncify” file system access, network
> access, queues, terminals, windowing systems, etc…
> 
> - PIP 801: Threads
> Split off from Paulo Maura’s multi-threading document.
> 
> - PIP 801: Mutex
> Split off from Paulo Maura’s multi-threading document.
> 
> - PIP 802: Message queues for multi-threading
> Split off from Paulo Maura’s multi-threading document.
> 
> - PIP 803: Simpler queues not for multi-threading (@marco’s ?)
> Other sources here.
> 
> - PIP 901: Embrace strings
> String literal, unify, (==)/2 and (@<)/2
> 
> - PIP 902: Fully embrace strings
> String is/2, (=:=)/2 and (<)/2
> 
> - PIP 903: Partial strings
> Compact and shared char lists.
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Guess how many newer Prolog systems allow this here:
>>
>> ?- [user].
>> p;q --> r.
>>     true.
>>
>> On the other hand SWI-Prolog disallows it:
>>
>> ?- [user].
>> p;q --> r.
>>
>> ERROR: user://1:29:
>> ERROR:    No permission to define dcg_nonterminal `p;q'
> 

Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-30 20:39 +0200
  Re: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-30 20:43 +0200
    Re: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-30 20:45 +0200
      Re: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-31 07:55 +0200
        Re: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-31 08:07 +0200
  post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1 (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 20:20 +0200
    Re: post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1 (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-10 20:33 +0200
      Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 00:02 +0200
        Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 00:05 +0200
          Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 00:16 +0200
            Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 00:25 +0200
              Re: Is a PIP for Syntax extensions necessary? (Was; post-N246 Read- and Write-Option variable_names/1) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-11 14:46 +0200
  A PIP classification scheme is needed (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-13 11:18 +0200
    Re: A PIP classification scheme is needed (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-13 11:23 +0200
      Re: A PIP classification scheme is needed (Was: DCG restrictions on the left-hand side [Novacore]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-13 13:08 +0200

csiph-web