Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #190991
| From | Jack Dangler <tdldev@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? |
| Date | 2018-01-12 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <v79Ul-1F3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <v4edP-6iy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <v4kCC-2bg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <v77IS-lC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <v797Y-1md-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/12/2018 10:00 AM, bw wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > >> According to answers on >> >> https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/176624/how-do-i-check-if-kpti-is-enabled-on-linux/176654 >> >> linux-image-4.9.0-5-amd64 4.9.65-3+deb9u2 is still vulnerable as shown >> below: >> >> # dmesg | grep -i isolation > You should get either > > [ 0.000000] Kernel/User page tables isolation: enabled > or > [ 0.000000] Kernel/User page tables isolation: disabled > > Search with dmesg | less it's about two pages down for me, > > $ uname -a > Linux debian 4.9.0-5-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.65-3+deb9u2 (2018-01-04) > x86_64 GNU/Linux > > I tried this on my Ubu workstation and didnt get anything back... $ dmesg | grep -i isolation $ $ uname -a Linux 4.10.0-40-generic #44~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 9 15:37:44 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com> - 2018-01-04 15:00 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2018-01-04 21:50 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com> - 2018-01-08 16:40 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Jeroen Mathon <jeroenmathonmac@gmail.com> - 2018-01-08 17:20 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2018-01-08 18:10 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2018-01-08 18:40 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2018-01-08 22:30 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com> - 2018-01-10 13:50 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-12 14:40 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2018-01-12 16:10 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Jack Dangler <tdldev@gmail.com> - 2018-01-12 17:00 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-01-12 17:00 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-12 22:10 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-01-12 22:20 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-12 22:20 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Nick <debuser@acrasis.net> - 2018-01-12 22:30 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-12 22:50 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - XEN silent_disable? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2018-01-13 02:10 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - XEN silent_disable? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-13 08:30 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - XEN silent_disable? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-13 10:50 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - XEN silent_disable? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-13 12:30 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2018-01-13 09:10 +0100
Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2018-01-13 09:50 +0100
csiph-web