Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #190803

Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA?

From francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA?
Date 2018-01-08 16:40 +0100
Message-ID <v5HGN-7D4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <v4edP-6iy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <v4kCC-2bg-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, francis picabia wrote:
> > Redhat, Ubuntu and others have kernel updates available today for this
> > kernel patch that has been worked on since November. Normally Debian
> > has been quick out of the gate with security measures.
> >
> > Is there an ETA when Debian will update kernel packages?
>
> The DSA has been (will be shortly?) released for stable. Unstable,
> testing, and likely oldstable will probably follow soon.
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-4078-1
>
>
>
Thanks for the response.  I'm looking now and I see stretch and wheezy are
addressed, but not jessie.  Odd.  Why would old-stable be a challenge?

I'm concerned because we run a system for students to do programming, and
there
is typically one in the crowd who will try out any script kiddies in the
news.  For
the time being I've blocked access to the system, but faculty expect it
will be available for use in a week or so.  I have the option to install
the stretch kernel and run in a hybrid version for awhile, but I'm not sure
if there will be problems with that workaround.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com> - 2018-01-04 15:00 +0100
  Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2018-01-04 21:50 +0100
    Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com> - 2018-01-08 16:40 +0100
      Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Jeroen Mathon <jeroenmathonmac@gmail.com> - 2018-01-08 17:20 +0100
      Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2018-01-08 18:10 +0100
        Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> - 2018-01-08 18:40 +0100
      Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2018-01-08 22:30 +0100
        Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com> - 2018-01-10 13:50 +0100
    Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-12 14:40 +0100
      Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2018-01-12 16:10 +0100
        Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Jack Dangler <tdldev@gmail.com> - 2018-01-12 17:00 +0100
          Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-01-12 17:00 +0100
        Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-12 22:10 +0100
          Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-01-12 22:20 +0100
            Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-12 22:20 +0100
          Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Nick <debuser@acrasis.net> - 2018-01-12 22:30 +0100
            Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-12 22:50 +0100
              Re: CVE-2017-5754 - XEN silent_disable? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2018-01-13 02:10 +0100
                Re: CVE-2017-5754 - XEN silent_disable? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-13 08:30 +0100
                Re: CVE-2017-5754 - XEN silent_disable? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2018-01-13 10:50 +0100
                Re: CVE-2017-5754 - XEN silent_disable? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-13 12:30 +0100
              Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2018-01-13 09:10 +0100
                Re: CVE-2017-5754 - ETA? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2018-01-13 09:50 +0100

csiph-web