Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #107475
| From | Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES |
| Date | 2024-06-20 08:05 +0300 |
| Organization | - |
| Message-ID | <v50dbn$2e5ko$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <v4s07h$1boeu$5@dont-email.me> <v4sb8k$1e266$2@dont-email.me> <v4sl6p$1g2ci$1@dont-email.me> <v4u5at$1sof1$1@dont-email.me> <v4unbc$1vpm0$8@dont-email.me> |
On 2024-06-19 13:44:12 +0000, olcott said:
> On 6/19/2024 3:36 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-06-18 18:55:21 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 6/18/2024 11:05 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-06-18 12:57:21 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/18/2024 3:03 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-06-17 13:03:56 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/17/2024 2:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-16 12:47:09 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/16/2024 2:53 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-15 16:22:09 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/13/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > On 6/13/24 11:32 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >> It is contingent upon you to show the exact steps of how H computes
>>>>>>>>>>> >> the mapping from the x86 machine language finite string input to
>>>>>>>>>>> >> H(D,D) using the finite string transformation rules specified by
>>>>>>>>>>> >> the semantics of the x86 programming language that reaches the
>>>>>>>>>>> >> behavior of the directly executed D(D)
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > Why? I don't claim it can.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The first six steps of this mapping are when instructions
>>>>>>>>>>> at the machine address range of [00000cfc] to [00000d06]
>>>>>>>>>>> are simulated/executed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> After that the behavior of D correctly simulated by H diverges
>>>>>>>>>>> from the behavior of D(D) because the call to H(D,D) by D
>>>>>>>>>>> correctly simulated by H cannot possibly return to D.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _D()
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000cfc](01) 55 push ebp
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000cfd](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000cff](03) 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d02](01) 50 push eax ; push D
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d03](03) 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d06](01) 51 push ecx ; push D
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d07](05) e800feffff call 00000b0c ; call H
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d0c](03) 83c408 add esp,+08
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d0f](02) 85c0 test eax,eax
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d11](02) 7404 jz 00000d17
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d13](02) 33c0 xor eax,eax
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d15](02) eb05 jmp 00000d1c
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d17](05) b801000000 mov eax,00000001
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d1c](01) 5d pop ebp
>>>>>>>>>>> [00000d1d](01) c3 ret
>>>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0034) [00000d1d]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When you put "V2" or "V3" or something similar on the subject line
>>>>>>>>>> you should tell what is different from the original version.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I ask what are the steps
>>>>>>>>> I provide 6 steps and then ask what are the next steps.
>>>>>>>>> I provide all of the steps.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In which version?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *This is the simplest possible version*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> void DDD()
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> H0(DDD);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After six steps of DDD are correctly emulated by H0
>>>>>>> what machine address of DDD would it be at?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>>> [00001fd2] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
>>>>>>> [00001fd3] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
>>>>>>> [00001fd5] 68d21f0000 push 00001fd2 ; push DDD
>>>>>>> [00001fda] e8f3f9ffff call 000019d2 ; call H0
>>>>>>> [00001fdf] 83c404 add esp,+04 ; housekeeping
>>>>>>> [00001fe2] 5d pop ebp ; housekeeping
>>>>>>> [00001fe3] c3 ret ; return to caller
>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00001fe3]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So how is this a difference between the original version and V2 and V3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No params thus easier to see that it pushes its own machine address.
>>>>
>>>> My question is still unanswered.
>>>>
>>>
>>> When I answer the question that the difference
>>> is that one of them had parameters and the other one
>>> does not have parameters it is dishonest of you
>>> to say that I did not answer the question.
>>
>> The qestion is not answered until you say which of the three versions
>> has parameters and which has not and how the third one differs from
>> the one that has parameters and from the one that nas not.
>>
>
> typedef void (*ptr)();
> int H0(ptr P);
> int H(ptr P, ptr I);
>
> void DDD()
> {
> H0(DDD);
> }
>
> void DDDD(ptr x)
> {
> H(x,x);
> }
>
> That seems to be saying that you don't know enough about the C
> programming language to know what a parameter is thus cannot
> tell the difference between DDD that has no parameters and DDDD
> that had one parameter.
My question is still unanswered. Apparently you do not undestand
the concept of question.
--
Mikko
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 11:22 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-15 12:33 -0400
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 16:56 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-15 19:01 -0400
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 18:30 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-15 19:37 -0400
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 19:05 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-15 20:13 -0400
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 19:48 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-15 21:19 -0400
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 20:42 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-15 21:58 -0400
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-16 11:00 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-16 07:48 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-16 13:30 -0400
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-17 10:19 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 07:57 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-18 11:01 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 07:48 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-18 19:04 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-16 10:53 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-16 07:47 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-16 13:30 -0400
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-17 10:20 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 08:03 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-17 18:46 -0400
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-18 11:03 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 07:57 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-18 19:05 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 13:55 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-19 11:36 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 08:44 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-20 08:05 +0300
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-20 00:19 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 14:04 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-19 09:58 +0200
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 07:58 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-19 15:46 +0200
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 09:55 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-19 17:39 +0200
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 10:46 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2024-06-19 16:29 +0000
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-19 12:07 -0500
Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-20 09:53 +0200
csiph-web