Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #106873
| From | Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case |
| Followup-To | comp.theory |
| Date | 2024-06-10 08:35 +0000 |
| Organization | muc.de e.V. |
| Message-ID | <v46drm$13ke$1@news.muc.de> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <v45ive$3tpr9$2@dont-email.me> <v45jqr$3h642$3@i2pn2.org> <v45kiu$3ue8q$2@dont-email.me> <v45lak$3h641$3@i2pn2.org> <v45m0m$3ukqt$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.theory
[ Followup-To: set ] In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/9/2024 8:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 6/9/24 9:23 PM, olcott wrote: [ .... ] >>> THIS IS AN OFFICIAL CEASE AND DESIST NOTIFICATION. >>> STOP CALLING ME A LIAR. >> Then stop Lying! > *I never have lied and you know it* You have frequently lied. All these times when you have called your notions "verified facts", but have been unable to show the verification. All these other times when you have said something is "undeniably proven" or the like, and there is no proof in sight. And there was that little lie when you said you had a fully worked out turing machine which contradicted a well known proof of the Halting Theorem. > *THAT YOU REFUSE TO EVEN POINT OUT ANY 100% SPECIFIC MISTAKE* > *AND PERSIST IN CALLING ME A LIAR AFTER A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER* > *WINS DEFAMATION CASES* You have failed to withdraw these lies, or apologize for them. The only way you are not a liar might be that your grasp of truth is so tenuous that you are unable to distinguish truth from falsehood. Whether that would win you a defamation case is somewhat questionable. > *I have proved that D is correctly simulated by H FOR THREE YEARS* > *I have proved that D is correctly simulated by H FOR THREE YEARS* > *I have proved that D is correctly simulated by H FOR THREE YEARS* As an example you have insisted that you have proven the absurdity that a correctly simulated machine D has a different behaviour from that same machine running. By the simple meaning of words, this cannot be true. It is a lie. > That D is correctly simulated by H is proved by the fact that the x86 > source-code of D exactly matches the two execution traces that I > provided. That's a proof? Maybe if the two execution traces, simulated and running, matched, there might be something to go on. But that would only apply to a specific H and its D; you still have to prove it for the general case. [ .... ] > -- > Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius > hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 09:19 -0500
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 11:07 -0500
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-09 17:59 +0000
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 13:23 -0500
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-09 19:13 +0000
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 19:02 -0500
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 20:23 -0400
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 19:26 -0500
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 20:41 -0400
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 19:56 -0500
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 21:10 -0400
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 20:23 -0500
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 21:36 -0400
D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 20:48 -0500
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 22:16 -0400
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 21:39 -0500
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 22:45 -0400
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 21:53 -0500
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 23:09 -0400
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 22:21 -0500
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-10 07:16 -0400
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2024-06-10 08:35 +0000
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- verified fact for 3 years olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 09:39 -0500
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- verified fact for 3 years joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-10 15:33 +0000
Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- verified fact for 3 years Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-11 21:44 -0400
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-10 08:40 +0000
Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 10:27 -0500
csiph-web