Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.theory > #106205

Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?

From olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.theory, sci.logic
Subject Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?
Date 2024-06-03 20:54 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <v3ls46$4h2j$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <lBmcnX-HlodbjMP7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <v3lo7l$3sil$1@dont-email.me> <v3lots$2uv04$14@i2pn2.org> <v3lp8g$43oa$2@dont-email.me> <v3lrh9$2uv03$2@i2pn2.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/3/2024 8:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/3/24 9:05 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/3/2024 7:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/3/24 8:47 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/3/2024 1:56 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
>>>>> On 03/06/2024 19:03, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/3/2024 12:36 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
>>>>>>> On 03/06/2024 08:58, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>> Op 03.jun.2024 om 02:16 schreef immibis:
>>>>>>>>> The halting problem says you can't find a Turing machine that 
>>>>>>>>> tells whether executing each other Turing machine will halt. 
>>>>>>>>> Simulation has nothing to do with the question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe because by using simulation he can shift the attention 
>>>>>>>> from the pathological part of the Linz proof, to another halting 
>>>>>>>> problem, namely that a simulating decider does not halt because 
>>>>>>>> it causes infinite recursion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PO's simulating decider does not cause infinite recursion.  That 
>>>>>>> only occurs in the case where the decider performs a FULL 
>>>>>>> simulation of its input, whereas typically for PO his H/HH/... 
>>>>>>> perform PARTIAL simulations, where the decider monitors what is 
>>>>>>> being simulated and breaks off the simulation when a particular 
>>>>>>> condition is observed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for affirming that. You are my most technically
>>>>>> competent and honest reviewer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So yes, there is recursive simulation, but not /infinite/ 
>>>>>>> recursion since at each level of simulation the simulator is free 
>>>>>>> to just stop simulating at any time.  In practice this means that 
>>>>>>> the outer simulator H will be the one to break out, since it will 
>>>>>>> always be ahead of all the inner simulations of H in how far it 
>>>>>>> has progressed.  This situation is in contrast with direct call 
>>>>>>> recursion, where the outer caller has no control to break the 
>>>>>>> recursion - it only regains control once the inner calls have all 
>>>>>>> returned.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PO does not properly understand this distinction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *You can keep ignoring this that does not make it go away*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/13/2022 11:29:23 AM
>>>>>> MIT Professor Michael Sipser agreed this verbatim paragraph is 
>>>>>> correct
>>>>>> (He has neither reviewed nor agreed to anything else in this paper)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Professor Sipser agreed>
>>>>>> If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D until H
>>>>>> correctly determines that its simulated D would never stop running
>>>>>> unless aborted then
>>>>>>
>>>>>> H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D 
>>>>>> specifies a
>>>>>> non-halting sequence of configurations.
>>>>>> </Professor Sipser agreed>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *You can ignore the above forever, that does not make it away*
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not ignore the above.  I recently posted an example of it: a 
>>>>> simulating HD correctly reporting non-halting after detecting a 
>>>>> tight loop in the computation represented by its input.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem with the above is with YOU.  (You misinterpret/misapply 
>>>>> what Sipser says.)
>>>>>
>>>>> And of course your entire purpose behind quoting the above is just 
>>>>> an appeal to authority.  You know that's a fallacy, because from 
>>>>> time to time you accuse others of doing it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> His own claim that D does not reach the pathological part (after 
>>>>>>>> line 03), displays already that the simulation is unable to 
>>>>>>>> process the pathological part. But the simulation introduces a 
>>>>>>>> new halting problem (recursive simulation), which he thinks is 
>>>>>>>> an answer for the original halting problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're using PO's phrase "pathological" but that is a bad 
>>>>>>> (misleading) term because it suggests there is something 
>>>>>>> WRONG/BAD (aka sick?) in the situation.  E.g. H processing input 
>>>>>>> which is a description of its own source code.  There is nothing 
>>>>>>> whatsoever wrong with that - it's just that PO gets confused by 
>>>>>>> it and so argues to ban it.  Perhaps there  is an alternative 
>>>>>>> term that doesn't have the deliberate connotation of "sickness".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Two PhD computer science professors disagree*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> E C R Hehner. *Problems with the Halting Problem*, COMPUTING2011 
>>>>>> Symposium on 75 years of Turing Machine and Lambda-Calculus, 
>>>>>> Karlsruhe Germany, invited, 2011 October 20-21; Advances in 
>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering v.10 n.1 p.31-60, 2013
>>>>>> https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/PHP.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> E C R Hehner. *Objective and Subjective Specifications*
>>>>>> WST Workshop on Termination, Oxford.  2018 July 18.
>>>>>> See https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/OSS.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill Stoddart. *The Halting Paradox*
>>>>>> 20 December 2017
>>>>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05340
>>>>>> arXiv:1906.05340 [cs.LO]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *You can ignore the above forever, that does not make it away*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, it kinda DOES.  This is just a blatant appeal to authority on 
>>>>> your part, so it can rightly be ignored.  I'll say again - if you 
>>>>> have some argument to make, argue it yourself in your own words 
>>>>> rather than attempting to shut down discussion through appeal to 
>>>>> authority.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Those were my verbatim words that professor Sipser agreed to*
>>>> All the people that tried to show how I misinterpreted my own words
>>>> utterly failed.
>>>>
>>>> Those that claimed Professor Sipser understood my words differently 
>>>> than
>>>> I did had only one basis that I remember being presented that is easily
>>>> proven false. *They tried to get away with contradicting this*
>>>>
>>>> DD correctly emulated by any HH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT
>>>> DD correctly emulated by any HH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT
>>>> DD correctly emulated by any HH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT
>>>
>>> It does.
>>>
>>> Has been proven.
>>>
>>
>> *I say that you know you are a liar until after you show the steps*
> 
> DD will halt (Remember, I am not saying the somulaiton by HH, but that 
> DD itself will halt).
> 

That IS the strawman deception that might possibly (I hope not)
get you condemned to Hell.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Back to comp.theory | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2024-06-03 02:16 +0200
  Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-02 20:34 -0400
  Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-03 04:28 +0100
    Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 22:50 -0500
      Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 07:14 -0400
      Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2024-06-03 15:36 +0200
      Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-03 17:25 +0100
        Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 12:54 -0500
          Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 20:57 -0400
          Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-04 02:38 +0100
            Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 20:46 -0500
              Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 21:59 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 21:18 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 22:49 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 12:12 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-04 21:47 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-05 10:08 +0300
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 08:08 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 21:47 +0800
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 09:10 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 11:25 +0300
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 08:13 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 18:18 +0300
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 10:32 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-06 22:08 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-06 07:10 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-04 03:57 +0100
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 22:12 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 23:57 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 12:26 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-04 21:47 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review immibis <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-04 19:36 +0200
    Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-03 10:42 +0100
      Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 07:20 -0500
        Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2024-06-03 15:39 +0200
        Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-03 17:27 +0300
          Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 13:14 -0500
            Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 20:56 -0400
            Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-04 08:21 +0000
              Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 12:31 -0500
            Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-04 11:28 +0300
              Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 12:40 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways immibis <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-04 20:27 +0200
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-04 21:48 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 21:05 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways John Smith <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-05 04:12 +0200
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 21:16 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-04 22:22 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-05 10:28 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 08:24 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-05 19:39 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways John Smith <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-05 19:03 +0200
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 12:09 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways John Smith <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-05 19:29 +0200
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 12:37 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 18:16 +0000
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 18:33 +0000
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 21:09 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-05 22:28 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 11:52 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 08:37 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-06 22:08 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-05 19:42 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 11:45 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 08:23 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-06 22:08 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-04 22:22 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-05 10:11 +0200
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 08:59 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-05 20:51 +0200
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 17:44 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-06 18:01 +0200
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 11:07 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-06 18:34 +0200
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 11:44 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways immibis <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-06 20:09 +0200
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-05 19:46 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 12:02 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 08:41 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 18:07 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 10:15 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-06 22:08 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-07 09:19 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-06 22:08 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-05 10:13 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 08:18 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 18:25 +0000
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-05 19:51 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 12:34 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 08:48 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 18:09 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 10:18 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-07 09:22 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 09:09 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 11:14 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-07 21:02 +0000
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 17:27 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-08 09:13 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 07:42 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 09:03 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 11:09 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 08:27 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 14:08 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-08 09:06 +0300
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 07:35 -0500
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 09:03 -0400
                Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2024-06-07 16:25 +0200
            Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2024-06-04 16:38 +0200
        Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-03 22:09 +0200
          Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 16:24 -0500
            Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-04 12:29 +0200
              Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-04 12:52 +0200
                Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-04 17:58 +0100
                How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 13:02 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-04 21:26 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 17:16 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-04 21:48 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-05 10:21 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 09:04 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 18:28 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-05 20:55 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 09:32 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 07:45 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 18:05 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error John Smith <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-05 03:20 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 20:33 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error John Smith <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-05 03:39 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 21:07 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error John Smith <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-05 04:13 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 21:19 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error John Smith <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-05 17:40 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 11:51 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 18:38 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-05 19:52 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-05 10:38 +0100
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting --- Ben's strawman deception olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 07:09 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting --- Ben's strawman deception joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 17:57 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting --- Ben's strawman deception olcon'tt <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-07 16:10 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-05 16:55 +0100
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 11:49 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error John Smith <news2@immibis.com> - 2024-06-05 19:25 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 12:35 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 18:22 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-06 00:33 +0100
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 19:48 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-05 21:10 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-05 21:28 +0100
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 17:07 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations incorrectly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-05 23:04 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-06 22:55 +0100
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 21:53 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-06 23:29 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-07 14:55 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 09:59 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 11:14 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-07 15:24 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-04 21:48 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-05 10:37 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 08:29 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-05 19:54 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 13:15 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 08:53 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-06 18:14 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 10:31 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-07 09:30 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 09:47 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-06-07 16:55 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 10:05 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-06-07 17:09 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 10:20 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 11:28 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-07 15:32 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 10:40 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 11:51 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-07 16:34 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 11:53 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-07 20:40 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-08 03:43 +0100
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 23:03 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 22:36 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 09:03 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 08:43 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 10:05 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 11:15 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 08:45 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 14:08 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 22:16 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 09:03 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-08 09:28 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 07:47 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 08:59 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 08:22 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 10:06 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-08 17:43 +0100
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis --- olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 12:19 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis --- Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 16:33 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 11:19 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations incorrectly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-07 15:27 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations incorrectly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 10:30 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations incorrectly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis news2@immibis.com - 2024-06-07 17:32 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations incorrectly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 11:52 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 11:14 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-07 19:56 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 12:11 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 14:32 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-08 09:36 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 07:52 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 09:10 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 08:48 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 10:10 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 09:20 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 10:54 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 10:07 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 11:15 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 10:32 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 12:03 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 12:10 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-08 18:12 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 13:36 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-08 19:59 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 15:15 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-08 21:37 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 16:42 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 17:50 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 17:04 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 18:27 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 17:34 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 22:47 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 21:58 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 23:53 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 23:02 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 00:11 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 23:38 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 14:08 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 11:38 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 08:58 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 18:56 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 11:23 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-10 09:30 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 09:59 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-11 10:35 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-11 12:38 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 16:23 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 15:34 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 16:47 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 15:52 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 16:57 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 16:14 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 17:28 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 16:38 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 17:48 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 16:58 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 18:25 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 17:30 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 22:47 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 22:02 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 23:56 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 23:06 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 14:08 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 11:20 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 08:53 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 18:15 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 11:18 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 14:08 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-10 09:57 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 10:05 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-11 10:22 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-10 12:50 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 14:08 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-07 21:00 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 17:26 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 19:00 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-07 23:19 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 18:44 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 20:38 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-06-08 02:25 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 19:35 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 20:48 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-08 09:42 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 08:04 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-08 15:20 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 08:32 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-08 15:56 +0200
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 09:11 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 10:20 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 10:17 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 09:36 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-08 13:46 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 09:02 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-08 10:31 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 11:52 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 09:03 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 18:13 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 11:15 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-09 17:47 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-10 10:54 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 10:22 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 14:08 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 11:47 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 08:59 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-09 18:11 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-09 11:09 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting -- TM as finite string joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-09 17:50 +0000
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-09 14:08 -0400
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-10 11:01 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 10:23 -0500
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-11 10:25 +0300
                Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-07 11:14 -0400
            Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-04 13:02 +0200
        Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 20:56 -0400
      Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-03 17:58 +0100
  Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-03 09:58 +0200
    Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-03 18:36 +0100
      Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 13:03 -0500
        Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-06-03 19:56 +0100
          Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- woeful ignorance olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 14:26 -0500
          Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 19:47 -0500
            Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 20:59 -0400
              Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 20:05 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 21:44 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 20:54 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 21:58 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 21:09 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 22:26 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 21:47 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-03 22:53 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 12:06 -0500
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-04 21:47 -0400
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-06-05 10:31 +0200
                Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-05 09:06 -0500
            Re: Why is Olcott so ignorant, anyway? immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2024-06-04 17:25 +0200
  Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-03 13:38 +0300

csiph-web