Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #190495
| From | Joel Wirāmu Pauling <joel@aenertia.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? |
| Date | 2017-12-31 23:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <v2U7v-25u-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <v2dcd-7gG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <v2dlT-7mc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <v2xXj-49E-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <v2F8t-zD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <v2PUe-7C7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
The reason Redhat dropped btrfs support is because it currently has no native cryptographic function. And from the various threads I've read on the topic there is no easy answer to the problem. On 1 January 2018 at 06:44, Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> wrote: > David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> wrote: > > On 12/30/17 14:38, Matthew Crews wrote: > > >> The main issue I see with using BTRFS with MDADM is that you lose the > >> benefit of bit-rot repair. MDADM can't correct bit rot, but > >> BTRFS-Raid (and ZFS raid arrays) can, but only with native raid > >> configurations. > > > AFAIK: > > > 1. mdadm RAID1 can fix bit rot, so long as one drive has a good block > > to fix the others. > > Yes, but it can't fix silent bit-rot, where incorrect bytes are read > from the drive without the drive noticing. In that case the Kernel has > no way of knowing which bytes are the correct ones, you need some sort > of checksum for that. > > Grüße, > Sven. > > -- > Sigmentation fault. Core dumped. > >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2017-12-26 20:50 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi> - 2017-12-26 20:50 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2017-12-26 23:30 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-12-27 00:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2017-12-27 00:40 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Jan Vales <jan@jvales.net> - 2017-12-26 21:30 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2017-12-26 22:40 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-12-27 04:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2017-12-27 13:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Tom Dial <tddial@comcast.net> - 2017-12-27 23:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Rick Thomas <rick.thomas@pobox.com> - 2017-12-28 02:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-12-28 02:20 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi> - 2017-12-28 07:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-12-28 17:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi> - 2017-12-28 18:30 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Glenn English <ghe2001@gmail.com> - 2017-12-28 20:40 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2017-12-28 20:50 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2017-12-29 01:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Jan Vales <jan@jvales.net> - 2017-12-30 00:50 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2017-12-30 01:30 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Jan Vales <jan@jvales.net> - 2017-12-30 01:40 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Matthew Crews <mailinglists@mattcrews.com> - 2017-12-30 23:40 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-12-31 07:20 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-12-31 18:50 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-12-31 23:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-12-31 23:50 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2018-01-02 03:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-01-02 11:30 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2018-01-02 17:40 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-01-02 19:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-01-02 20:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-01-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-01-04 00:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-01-04 09:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-01-04 20:20 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-01-04 22:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-01-04 12:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2018-01-03 00:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2018-01-03 00:50 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-01-03 02:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2018-01-06 13:30 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2018-01-03 08:40 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Joel Wirāmu Pauling <joel@aenertia.net> - 2017-12-31 23:20 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2018-01-03 04:40 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2017-12-30 10:30 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2017-12-28 21:10 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2017-12-28 18:00 +0100
Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2017-12-29 05:00 +0100
csiph-web