Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #187609

Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:16:41AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:

[...]

> Another one is "import" - should simply NEVER be a program name -
> should be reserved.
> 
> man page: import - saves any visible window on an X server and
> outputs it as an image file. You can capture a single window, the
> entire screen, or any rectangular portion of the screen
> 
> git does it sensibly (in the last few years) with a primary basename
> and sub commands.
> 
> Many of these packages (especially old X stuff) “should” migrate to
> the command/subcommand way of life.

Funny how these young-ups tend to lump everything older than a couple
of years as "old X stuff" ;-P [1]

To be fair towards X, they were somewhat aware of this name space
problem, and most X clients (distributed by the X suite) have the
prefix "x". Might be better, but actually not bad.

Now "import" is quite another kettle of fish: it's part of the
ImageMagick suite (not much to do with X, actually), which has the
(questionable) tradition of calling its things "display", "convert",
"identify", "compare"... or even "conjure"). Now ImageMagick is so
useful that people seem to tolerate it, but a prefix (e.g. "im-")
or a super-command ("im") would be more modern, yes.

Cheers

[1] Hey, *very* tongue-in-cheek. No offense meeant. But the situation
   nearly forced me to that nonsense.

- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlnXKEEACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYCrQCdG8HzAxnez0uQ6ToMJEV7aasP
h8UAmwe36ipqPhS04rY/yBs5Ql2bN6jE
=ZDIj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames harry666t@gmail.com (Kamil Cholewiński) - 2017-10-05 22:30 +0200
  Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2017-10-05 22:40 +0200
    Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2017-10-06 00:20 +0200
      Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-10-06 09:00 +0200
        Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-10-06 15:00 +0200
          Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2017-10-06 15:30 +0200
            Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-10-06 15:50 +0200
              Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-10-13 14:00 +0200
                Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-10-13 14:40 +0200
            Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames Jerome BENOIT <calculus@rezozer.net> - 2017-10-06 16:30 +0200
              Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-10-06 16:40 +0200
          Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> - 2017-10-06 23:20 +0200
      Re: Many executables across Debian's archives share basenames Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2017-10-13 14:00 +0200

csiph-web