Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9912

Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/04/2017 04:41 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/10/17 22:46, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 09/29/2017 01:08 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
>>> Hello guyes.
>>>
>>>> override_dh_sphinxdoc:
>>>> ifeq (,$(findstring nodocs, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
>>>                                  ^^^^
>>> nodocs or nodoc
>>>
>>> I alsa do something like this when there is extensions.
>>>
>>> override_dh_sphinxdoc:
>>> ifeq (,$(findstring nodoc, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
>>>     PYBUILD_SYSTEM=custom \
>>>     PYBUILD_BUILD_ARGS="cd docs && PYTHONPATH={build_dir}
>>> http_proxy='127.0.0.1:9' {interpreter} -m sphinx -N -bhtml source
>>> build/html" dh_auto_build  # HTML generator
>>>     dh_installdocs "docs/build/html" -p python-gpyfft-doc
>>>     dh_sphinxdoc -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>>> endif
>>
>> In fact, I was thinking that probably, it'd be nicer to even do:
>>
>> ifeq (,$(findstring nodoc, $(DEB_BUILD_PROFILES)))
>>
>> and have Build-Profiles: <!nodoc> for the python-foo-doc package. This
>> could even become a standard in the DPMT if everyone agrees.
>>
>> Thoughts anyone?
> 
> s/DEB_BUILD_PROFILES/DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
> 
> Quoting the relevant part of the documentation for the nodoc build
> profile [1]:
> 
> "Builds that set this profile must also add nodoc to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS"
> 
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec
> 
> Cheers,
> Ghis

Yeah, I saw it, though I was wondering if it was a good idea or not to
attempt to change this. I don't really see the point of having to set
both options, when only a single one should be enough. Also, if you only
set DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nodoc, then you end up with an empty -doc package,
which isn't very useful. So, I don't really see the use case of having 2
options here.

Your thoughts?

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

providing sphinx3-* binaries Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2017-09-27 00:30 +0200
  Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2017-09-28 00:10 +0200
    Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2017-09-28 09:40 +0200
    Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2017-09-28 14:30 +0200
      Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2017-09-28 19:00 +0200
        Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2017-09-28 19:20 +0200
  Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-09-29 13:00 +0200
    RE:providing sphinx3-* binaries PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2017-09-29 13:30 +0200
      Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-09-29 14:00 +0200
        RE:providing sphinx3-* binaries PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> - 2017-09-29 14:20 +0200
      Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-03 23:50 +0200
        Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2017-10-04 04:50 +0200
          Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2017-10-04 11:50 +0200

csiph-web