Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14023
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.prolog |
| Subject | Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence |
| Date | 2024-03-24 18:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <utpnnq$1p6qe$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <338dc0fb-4a93-405f-99da-7799d25ddc91n@googlegroups.com> <url15e$m5i4$3@solani.org> <ut45h5$1efic$1@solani.org> <ut45uc$1efp6$1@solani.org> <utnsb9$1o5dp$1@solani.org> |
Is 3 seconds even enough to generate unique Sudokus? How many trials would be needed? The uniqueness problem seems to have no useful reduction, already the question whether a partial latin square has a unique solution is NP complete? Finding Another Solution T. Yato & T. Seta - 2002 https://academic.timwylie.com/17CSCI4341/sudoku.pdf Mild Shock schrieb: > Now I have the feeling there are no difficult 9x9 > Sudokus for the computer. At least not for computers > running SWI-Prolog and using CLP(FD) with the global > constraint all_distinct/1. > > I was fishing among the 17-clue Sudokus, and the > hardest I could find so far was this one: > > /* Gordon Royle #3668 */ > problem(11,[[_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_], > [_,_,_,_,_,_,_,1,2], > [_,_,3,_,_,4,_,_,_], > [_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,3], > [_,1,_,2,5,_,_,_,_], > [6,_,_,_,_,_,7,_,_], > [_,_,_,_,2,_,_,_,_], > [_,_,7,_,_,_,4,_,_], > [5,_,_,1,6,_,_,8,_]]). > > But SWI-Prolog still does it in around 3 seconds. > SWI-Prolog does other 17-clue Sudokus in less than 100ms. > > Are there any 17-clue Sudokus that take more time?
Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 03:28 -0800
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 04:15 -0800
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 04:47 -0800
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 08:10 -0800
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 08:24 -0800
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 08:47 -0800
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 08:50 -0800
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mostowski Collapse <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 11:12 -0800
Was it worth the wait? [gemini by Google] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-22 16:49 +0100
Pulverizer against Delhi Belly? (Was: Was it worth the wait? [gemini by Google]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-22 19:11 +0100
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-27 17:03 +0100
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-16 14:06 +0100
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-16 14:13 +0100
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-24 01:32 +0100
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-03-24 18:26 +0100
Re: The road to Artificial Intelligence Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-03-25 09:59 +0200
csiph-web