Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1739247
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq |
| Date | 2017-09-25 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <utHya-2oD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uoqRk-7DR-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:51:49 +0800
Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com> wrote:
> push_rt_task() pick the first pushable task and find an eligible
> lowest_rq, then double_lock_balance(rq, lowest_rq). So if
> double_lock_balance() unlock the rq (when double_lock_balance() return 1),
> we have to check if this task is still on the rq.
>
> The problem is that the check conditions are not sufficient:
>
> if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != rq ||
> !cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu, &task->cpus_allowed) ||
> task_running(rq, task) ||
> !rt_task(task) ||
> !task_on_rq_queued(task))) {
>
> cpu2 cpu1 cpu0
> push_rt_task(rq1)
> pick task_A on rq1
> find rq0
> double_lock_balance(rq1, rq0)
> unlock(rq1)
> rq1 __schedule
> pick task_A run
> task_A sleep (dequeued)
> lock(rq0)
> lock(rq1)
> do_above_check(task_A)
> task_rq(task_A) == rq1
> cpus_allowed unchanged
> task_running == false
> rt_task(task_A) == true
> try_to_wake_up(task_A)
> select_cpu = cpu3
> enqueue(rq3, task_A)
How can this happen? The try_to_wake_up(task_A) needs to grab the rq
that task A is on, and we have that rq lock.
/me confused.
-- Steve
> task_A->on_rq = 1
> task_on_rq_queued(task_A)
> above_check passed, return rq0
> ...
> migrate task_A from rq1 to rq0
>
> So we can't rely on these checks of task_A to make sure the task_A is
> still on the rq1, even though we hold the rq1->lock. This patch will
> repick the first pushable task to be sure the task is still on the rq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com>
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com> - 2017-09-11 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq zhouchengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com> - 2017-09-12 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq zhouchengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com> - 2017-09-25 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-09-25 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq zhouchengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com> - 2017-09-26 03:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-09-26 05:20 +0200
csiph-web