Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1739085

Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM/vmx: re-write the msr auto switch feature

From Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM/vmx: re-write the msr auto switch feature
Date 2017-09-25 16:30 +0200
Message-ID <utCyt-7ys-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uttER-1un-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uttER-1un-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <utAdk-5RX-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <utB9o-6tv-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 25/09/2017 15:02, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 09/25/2017 07:54 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 25/09/2017 06:44, Wei Wang wrote:
>>>   +static void update_msr_autoload_count_max(void)
>>> +{
>>> +    u64 vmx_msr;
>>> +    int n;
>>> +
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * According to the Intel SDM, if Bits 27:25 of
>>> MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC is
>>> +     * n, then (n + 1) * 512 is the recommended max number of MSRs
>>> to be
>>> +     * included in the VMExit and VMEntry MSR auto switch list.
>>> +     */
>>> +    rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC, vmx_msr);
>>> +    n = ((vmx_msr & 0xe000000) >> 25) + 1;
>>> +    msr_autoload_count_max = n * KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_MSR_AUTO_LOAD_COUNT;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> Any reasons to do this if it's unlikely that we'll ever update more than
>> 512 MSRs?
>>
>> Paolo
> 
> It isn't a must to allocate memory for 512 MSRs, but I think it would
> be good to allocate memory at least for 128 MSRs, because on skylake
> we have 32 triplets of MSRs (FROM/TO/INFO), which are 96 in total
> already.
> 
> The disadvantage is that developers would need to manually calculate
> and change the number carefully when they need to add new MSRs for
> auto switching in the future. So, if consuming a little bit more
> memory isn't a concern, I think we can directly allocate memory based
> on what's recommended by the hardware.
Sure.  I was just thinking that it's unnecessary to actually use
VMX_MISC; sticking to one-page allocations is nicer.

Paolo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v1 1/4] KVM/vmx: re-write the msr auto switch feature Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com> - 2017-09-25 07:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM/vmx: re-write the msr auto switch feature Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-09-25 14:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM/vmx: re-write the msr auto switch feature Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com> - 2017-09-25 15:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM/vmx: re-write the msr auto switch feature Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-09-25 16:30 +0200

csiph-web