Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1737723

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: remove phy arg from port enable/disable

From Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: remove phy arg from port enable/disable
Date 2017-09-22 20:20 +0200
Message-ID <usAIq-WQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <usyZY-8kh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <usyZZ-8kh-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <uszMl-oq-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Florian,

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> writes:

> On 09/22/2017 09:17 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> The .port_enable and .port_disable functions are meant to deal with the
>> switch ports only, and no driver is using the phy argument anyway.
>> Remove it.
>
> I don't think this makes sense, there are perfectly legit reasons why a
> switch driver may have something to do with the PHY device attached to
> its per-port network interface, we should definitively keep that around,
> unless you think we should be accessing the PHY within the switch
> drivers by doing:
>
> struct phy_device *phydev = ds->ports[port].netdev->phydev?

bcm_sf2 is the only user for this phy argument right now. The reason I'm
doing this is because I prefer to discourage switch drivers to dig into
the phy device themselves while as you said there must be a cleaner
solution. This must be handled somehow elsewhere in the stack.

In the meantime, moving the PHY device up to the dsa_port structure is a
good solution, in order not to expose it in switch ops, but still make
it available to more complex drivers.

Do you know if netdev->phydev is usable? Why do DSA has its own copy in
dsa_slave_priv then?


I'll respin, thanks.

    Vivien

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH net-next 0/4] net: dsa: simplify port enabling Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2017-09-22 18:30 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: remove phy arg from port enable/disable Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2017-09-22 18:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: remove phy arg from port  enable/disable Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 19:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: remove phy arg from port enable/disable Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2017-09-22 20:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: remove phy arg from port  enable/disable Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 20:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: remove phy arg from port  enable/disable Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-09-22 21:20 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: make slave close symmetrical to open Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2017-09-22 18:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: make slave close symmetrical to  open Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-09-22 18:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: make slave close symmetrical to  open Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-09-22 19:20 +0200

csiph-web