Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?

From	Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround?
Date	2017-09-03 03:30 +0200
Message-ID	<ulrTA-1RK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tlBV7-62w-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <trtBw-4Lp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tru4x-5au-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <trx2p-6Z5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <trLI5-89d-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 04/02/2017 07:13 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 14:36 Fred <fred@blakemfg.com 
> <mailto:fred@blakemfg.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 04/01/2017 09:24 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
>     > On 04/01/2017 10:55 AM, cbannister@slingshot.co.nz
>     <mailto:cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
>     >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:38:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
>     >>> The two files are nearly identical and need them displayed
>     >>> simultaneously
>     >>> for instant visual comparison. Opening one of the files read only
>     >>> would be
>     >>> acceptable but not preferable.
>
>
> Try diffuse.
>
> -Tom
Do you have Kate on your system? You can open side-by-side versions of 
that, and that's a fine text editor that you don't have to
know vi or anything esoteric to use it.

--doug

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround? Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2017-09-03 03:30 +0200
  Re: Suitable text editor [NOT word processor] or workaround? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2017-09-07 17:20 +0200

csiph-web