Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #185371
| From | <jumpy@tutanota.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Debian 9.1 stable & bios_password |
| Date | 2017-08-17 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ufeZ5-4rP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
from debian wiki : edit /boot/grub/menu.lst and add the following two lines at the top. This prevents users from editing the boot items. timeout 5 specifies a 5 second delay before grub boots the default item. timeout 5 color cyan/blue white/blue password --md5 $1$A9NHZ/$N.6k9riAFMbV/nfsZ2LnD1 does this old (obsolete & unsecure) doc work ? could it be an alternative creating a menu.lst cheating a bit ? i like the color line & the simplicity. Updated how-to : Set Grub2 boot password on Debian based system (June 9, 2017) (https://linoxide.com/linux-how-to/set-grub-password) if i install both ; does it lock, unlock, act as a backdoor, make the system unbootable erasing/removing the boot process ? and if i install 2 password for the same user , does it work ? it is just a question about how secure could be a grub password (e.g) if a hack (old how-to) is still allowed ... (i suppose all vulnerabilities are patched yet). # does a grub2 password secure (unhackable ?) really the o.s ? # should you recommend it as a safe measure ? -- Securely sent with Tutanota.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Debian 9.1 stable & bios_password <jumpy@tutanota.com> - 2017-08-17 00:30 +0200 Re: Debian 9.1 stable & bios_password Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-08-17 11:40 +0200
csiph-web