Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1709971
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] livepatch: Add force sysfs attribute |
| Date | 2017-08-11 23:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <udpvA-6M-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ucTcl-4sX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ucTcl-4sX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:48:13PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> +static ssize_t force_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + /*
> + * klp_mutex lock is not grabbed here intentionally. It is not really
> + * needed. The race window is harmless and grabbing the lock would only
> + * hold the action back.
> + */
> + if (!klp_transition_patch) {
> + pr_info("no patching in progress, forced action ineffective\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
I think this is really a minor issue, and the -EINVAL is enough. As the
comment says, the race window is harmless. So I'd say there's no need
to scare the user with a printk.
--
Josh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 1/3] livepatch: Add force sysfs attribute Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2017-08-10 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] livepatch: Add force sysfs attribute Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-08-11 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] livepatch: Add force sysfs attribute Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2017-08-14 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] livepatch: Add force sysfs attribute Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2017-08-16 15:20 +0200
csiph-web