Re: delay the start of a service until LACP negotiation is complete

From	Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: delay the start of a service until LACP negotiation is complete
Date	2017-08-11 19:50 +0200
Message-ID	<udmem-6sy-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<ud4Ku-41n-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ude77-1CC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <udiu6-4b4-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <udl8C-5QR-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <udm4G-6pu-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Newsfeed am Wurmloch

Show all headers | View raw

John Ratliff <jratliff@bluemarble.net> wrote:
> <quote who="Sven Hartge">

>> Do you really need STP? Do you really need STP on that group of
>> ports?  Why not disable it completely.

> I'm not aware of any way to disable spanning tree on a per port basis,
> and no, I cannot disable it on the switch entirely.

Ah, Cisco. Yes, they don't do that, right.

S°

-- 
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

delay the start of a service until LACP negotiation is complete "John Ratliff" <jratliff@bluemarble.net> - 2017-08-11 01:10 +0200
  Re: delay the start of a service until LACP negotiation is complete Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-08-11 11:10 +0200
    Re: delay the start of a service until LACP negotiation is complete "John Ratliff" <jratliff@bluemarble.net> - 2017-08-11 15:50 +0200
      Re: delay the start of a service until LACP negotiation is complete Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-08-11 18:40 +0200
        Re: delay the start of a service until LACP negotiation is complete "John Ratliff" <jratliff@bluemarble.net> - 2017-08-11 19:40 +0200
          Re: delay the start of a service until LACP negotiation is complete Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-08-11 19:50 +0200

csiph-web