Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #9415
| From | Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? |
| Date | 2017-08-12 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <udF7j-1tj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <udAKm-7ct-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <udBwL-7Kj-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Private |
]] Christian Seiler > > So that means I don't think all of Debian should be in non-free because there > > are no free cpu designs > > Ahem, nobody said anything about non-free here, we're talking about > contrib. That said: for all release archs of Debian there are > actually free implementations of the CPU architecture, in the form > of Qemu. So I don't think this applies here. Taking this to its absurd extreme gets you, unsurprisingly, absurd results: Sure, qemu itself is free, but it'll have to run on an OS which is either not Debian (in which case, according to some of the arguments in this thread, it should go to contrib), or Debian. Eventually, you end up on the silicon. However, modern silicon is largely defined by software, and has supporting software on many chips (all of which is not in Debian), so effectively requires software outside of Debian to function (and so should go to contrib). I don't think our distro would be improved by arguing that all packages should move to contrib. Having to structure your code or packaging in a specific way to ensure you can actually put it in main rather than contrib also does not seem like something we should encourage; it should be done according to what makes technical sense. > > [free CPU designs] > > (although I'm sure there are...) > > There are, take a look at RISC-V, for example. [1] And for the > requirement about not requiring non-free software, you don't need > to have a fully free CPU design, just one where the microcode is > free. And I believe that current POWER CPUs fall under that > category. (I may be wrong though.) Doesn't help if it's not packaged in Debian, though. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2017-08-05 02:10 +0200
Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-08-05 15:50 +0200
Re: Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service "Dr. Bas Wijnen" <bas@wijnen.dtdns.net> - 2017-08-06 09:30 +0200
Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2017-08-06 17:30 +0200
Bug#856139: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2017-08-06 14:20 +0200
Bug#856139: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> - 2017-08-06 14:40 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service "Dr. Bas Wijnen" <wijnen@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 20:20 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2017-08-07 21:00 +0200
Debian packages advertising non-free services (was: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service) Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-08-08 01:40 +0200
Re: Debian packages advertising non-free services Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2017-08-08 07:40 +0200
Re: Debian packages advertising non-free services Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-08-08 07:50 +0200
Re: Debian packages advertising non-free services Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2017-08-08 09:00 +0200
Re: Debian packages advertising non-free services Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-08-08 10:10 +0200
Re: Debian packages advertising non-free services Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2017-08-08 08:20 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2017-08-08 05:50 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2017-08-11 14:10 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2017-08-11 17:00 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 00:00 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> - 2017-08-12 05:50 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service "Dr. Bas Wijnen" <wijnen@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 08:30 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 09:00 +0200
Are online services also software for Debian's rules? "Dr. Bas Wijnen" <wijnen@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 09:40 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 10:00 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-08-12 10:10 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? "Dr. Bas Wijnen" <wijnen@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 11:20 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 12:10 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 17:20 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? "Dr. Bas Wijnen" <wijnen@debian.org> - 2017-08-13 22:10 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2017-08-13 23:10 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2017-08-14 02:30 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2017-08-14 02:30 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? "Dr. Bas Wijnen" <wijnen@debian.org> - 2017-08-14 14:10 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2017-08-14 15:00 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? "Dr. Bas Wijnen" <wijnen@debian.org> - 2017-08-14 15:10 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-08-14 15:30 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Marc Haber <mh+debian-project@zugschlus.de> - 2017-08-14 15:30 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2017-08-14 19:40 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-08-14 19:50 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-08-12 12:10 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2017-08-12 16:00 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-08-12 16:20 +0200
Re: Are online services also software for Debian's rules? Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2017-08-12 16:50 +0200
win32-loader (was: Re: Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service) Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 17:00 +0200
Re: [pkg-go] Bug#856139: certspotter: long description advertises commercial service Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> - 2017-08-12 17:40 +0200
csiph-web