Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #184816

Re: disable orange progress running apt

From Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: disable orange progress running apt
Date 2017-08-07 17:30 +0200
Message-ID <ubS8H-1Uh-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ubLqy-5J4-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubP17-80C-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubPDQ-8gK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubRPl-1xo-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:02:10AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 07 August 2017 08:39:46 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Also while I'm here: the garish colors of apt(8) are not the #1 reason
> > I switched back to apt-get(8), but they are #2.  Whoever chose the
> > colors clearly doesn't use a terminal with a white background, because
> > yellow on white is simply unreadable.
> 
> That seems odd, and would tend to make me think of using the educational 
> club.

I don't understand; what part seems odd?  My use of terminals with
white backgrounds?  That's fair.  Most Linux kids these days seem to
prefer black backgrounds.

Or do you dispute the fact that apt uses yellow foreground text when
you do "apt update"?

In TERM=rxvt-unicode, apt uses the escape sequence ESC[33m to produce
yellow text.  I just captured it using "script" and verified this.
This is slightly different from the ESC[38;5;3m that "tput setaf 3"
uses, but they both give me yellow fg text when tested interactively.

> The only machine I have that uses apt as default, is a raspi running 
> jessie, and its happy as a clam, either on its full 16 bit color 
> framebuffer screen, or on a logged in terminal-4.8 here.

The Linux virtual console has a black background by default.
Rxvt has white.  Xterm also used to have a white background, but Debian
seems to have changed that at some point.  (xterm(1) still speaks of
"the X defaults (black text on a white background)" but only in a general
sense.)

> LS_COLORS=rs=0:di=01;34:[...]

Are you suggesting that apt(8) uses LS_COLORS?  That would surprise me.
It's most defintely not in the man page.  Then again, the word "color"
is nowhere in that man page.

It would also surprise me, because LS_COLORS tells ls(1) how to use
colors based on file types and extensions, which are not something that
apt(8) deals with.  apt deals with package names, package descriptions,
retrievals and retrieval failures, etc.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-07 10:20 +0200
  Re: disable orange progress running apt <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-08-07 10:30 +0200
    Re: disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-07 10:50 +0200
      Re: disable orange progress running apt <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-08-07 11:30 +0200
        Re: disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-07 14:00 +0200
          Re: disable orange progress running apt <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-08-07 15:10 +0200
            Re: disable orange progress running apt Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-08-07 15:20 +0200
              Re: disable orange progress running apt <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-08-07 15:40 +0200
              Re: disable orange progress running apt Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-08-07 17:20 +0200
              Re: disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-08 01:40 +0200
  Re: disable orange progress running apt Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-08-07 12:30 +0200
    Re: disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-07 14:10 +0200
      Re: disable orange progress running apt Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-08-07 14:40 +0200
        Re: disable orange progress running apt <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-08-07 15:20 +0200
          Re: disable orange progress running apt Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-08-07 19:10 +0200
        Re: disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-07 21:10 +0200
          Re: disable orange progress running apt Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-08-07 23:50 +0200
            Re: disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-08 03:10 +0200
              Re: disable orange progress running apt Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> - 2017-08-08 10:40 +0200
                Re: disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-08 11:40 +0200
                Re: disable orange progress running apt Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-08-08 15:00 +0200
                Re: disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-08 20:10 +0200
                Re: disable orange progress running apt Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-08-09 19:20 +0200
                Re: disable orange progress running apt Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-08-09 19:30 +0200
                Re: disable orange progress running apt Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-08-09 20:40 +0200
      Re: disable orange progress running apt Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-08-07 14:50 +0200
        Re: disable orange progress running apt Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-08-07 17:10 +0200
          Re: disable orange progress running apt Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-08-07 17:30 +0200
            Re: disable orange progress running apt Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-08-07 22:20 +0200
              Re: disable orange progress running apt Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-08-07 22:30 +0200
            Re: disable orange progress running apt Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2017-08-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: disable orange progress running apt Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-08-08 10:20 +0200
        Re: disable orange progress running apt Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2017-08-08 12:00 +0200

csiph-web