Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1705265

Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: implement spinlock optimization logic for arm/s390

From David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: implement spinlock optimization logic for arm/s390
Date 2017-08-07 11:00 +0200
Message-ID <ubM3f-5YJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ubLTz-5V4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubLTB-5V4-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Red Hat GmbH

Show all headers | View raw


On 07.08.2017 10:44, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> Implements the kvm_arch_vcpu_spin/preempt_in_kernel() for arm/s390,
> they needn't cache the result.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++--
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c       | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index f78cdc2..49b9178 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -2449,12 +2449,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  bool kvm_arch_vcpu_spin_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	return false;
> +	return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE);
>  }
>  
>  bool kvm_arch_vcpu_preempt_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	return false;
> +	return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE);
>  }
>  
>  void kvm_s390_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index e45f780..956f025 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -418,12 +418,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>  
>  bool kvm_arch_vcpu_spin_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	return false;
> +	return vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu);
>  }
>  
>  bool kvm_arch_vcpu_preempt_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	return false;
> +	return vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu);
>  }
>  
>  /* Just ensure a guest exit from a particular CPU */
> 

Can you split that into two parts? (arm and s390x?)

-- 

Thanks,

David

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/3] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-08-07 10:50 +0200
  [PATCH 3/3] KVM: implement spinlock optimization logic for arm/s390 "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-08-07 10:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: implement spinlock optimization logic for  arm/s390 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-08-07 11:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: implement spinlock optimization logic for arm/s390 "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-08-07 11:00 +0200
  [PATCH 1/3] KVM: add spinlock-exiting optimize framework "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-08-07 10:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: add spinlock-exiting optimize framework David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-08-07 11:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: add spinlock-exiting optimize framework "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-08-07 11:10 +0200

csiph-web