Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #91238

Re: Unbelievable

From Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Unbelievable
Date 2023-08-10 12:11 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ub2d4l$baei$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <uava4i$3ps0s$1@dont-email.me> <uavb27$3pufk$1@dont-email.me> <BXMAM.556453$AsA.466762@fx18.iad> <ub0789$3vftd$1@dont-email.me> <TLOAM.661858$GMN3.625036@fx16.iad>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 09.08.2023 um 18:01 schrieb Scott Lurndal:
> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes:
>> Am 09.08.2023 um 15:57 schrieb Scott Lurndal:
>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> But the're for sure no x64-machines with invariant TSC.
>>>
>>> Perhaps that is a mistranslation from deutsch?
>>
>> No, that's still the reason. I know that x86 CPUs have
>> had invariant TSCs for a long time, x64 CPUs anyway.
>>
>> I wonder if the argument that the TSC isn't used because it's
>> not portable across VM boundaries makes sense.
> 
> I suspect it is because nanosecond resolution on a filesystem
> timestamp is neither possible nor useful.

FILETIME isn't at nanosecond-resolution but in 100ns-steps. If you'd
have a 100ns interval timestamp sine 1/1/1601 00:00.0 the timestamp
would have ended 7/21/2185 23:34:33.71. Microsoft expects that Windows
wil last longer (about 30828). ;-)

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Cool ! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 19:25 +0200
  Unbelievable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 08:01 +0200
    Re: Unbelievable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 08:17 +0200
      Re: Unbelievable scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-08-09 13:57 +0000
        Re: Unbelievable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 16:18 +0200
          Re: Unbelievable scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-08-09 16:01 +0000
            Re: Unbelievable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 12:11 +0200
              Re: Unbelievable scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-08-10 14:44 +0000
                Re: Unbelievable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 17:40 +0200
                Re: Unbelievable scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-08-10 15:49 +0000
                Re: Unbelievable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 19:03 +0200
                Re: Unbelievable David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-11 08:28 +0200
                Re: Unbelievable Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 09:17 +0200
                Re: Unbelievable Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-08-11 12:02 +0100
                Re: Unbelievable Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2023-08-11 15:31 +0300

csiph-web