Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] trace-cmd record: use direname instead of custom code

From	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] trace-cmd record: use direname instead of custom code
Date	2017-08-03 01:50 +0200
Message-ID	<uabyN-8qn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<uaa9H-7BB-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu,  3 Aug 2017 00:15:57 +0200
Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> wrote:

> Prefer well known functions like `dirname(3)` instead of custom
> implementation for the same functionality
> 
> Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>

Thanks. I'll be traveling for a bit and wont get to these before I
leave. Just a note. When sending patches, can you add to the subject,
something like I just did "trace-cmd record:" to let those know that
this is a trace-cmd patch (especially when sent to LKML). It also makes
it easier for me when I look for trace-cmd patches, as I will filter on
"trace-cmd" in the subject.

Thanks,

-- Steve

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH V3 1/2] use direname instead of custom code Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> - 2017-08-03 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH V3 2/2] It makes the code clearer and less error prone. Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> - 2017-08-03 00:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] trace-cmd record: use direname instead of custom  code Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-08-03 01:50 +0200

csiph-web