Re: [PATCH 4/4] axonram: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in axon_ram_probe()

From	Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 4/4] axonram: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in axon_ram_probe()
Date	2017-08-04 19:00 +0200
Message-ID	<uaO77-15B-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<uatP3-4ko-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <uatP4-4ko-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 08/03/2017 12:17 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 20:34:00 +0200
> 
> The local variable "rc" will eventually be set only to an error code.
> Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c
> index 93cc902350db..5677f3371e30 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c
> @@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ static int axon_ram_probe(struct platform_device *device)
>  	static int axon_ram_bank_id = -1;
>  	struct axon_ram_bank *bank;
>  	struct resource resource;
> -	int rc = 0;

You've completely removed the decleration of "rc" instead of removing the "= 0"
initialization. I would expect a compilation test to have turned up an undeclared use
error for "rc".

-Tyrel

> 
>  	axon_ram_bank_id++;
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 4/4] axonram: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in  axon_ram_probe() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-03 21:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 4/4] axonram: Delete an unnecessary variable  initialisation in axon_ram_probe() Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-04 19:00 +0200

csiph-web