Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #189815

Re: unison compatibility in stretch

From Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: unison compatibility in stretch
Date 2017-12-12 11:20 +0100
Message-ID <uVPPk-1Ga-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uV8U2-7Bd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVfLP-3to-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVtF7-413-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVOzT-JW-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/12/17 08:50, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-12-11, Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> wrote:
>> On 10/12/17 19:40, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 10 Dec 2017 at 12:25, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> In the passt, I've always worked round this by installing the lower
>>>> version on my desktop and adjusted the links. This appears no lnger to
>>>> be possible.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know how to get round this? (I've no immediate intention to
>>>> upgrade the server).
>>> There is the -addversionno option which allows use to use different
>>> versions of unison on the server end.  Try this out (without adjusting
>>> any links).
>>>
>> No:
> What, no? Yes (WVSVNTB).
>
>> tony@tony-lx:~$ unison -addversionno tony
>> Contacting server...
>> bash: unison-2.48: command not found
>> Fatal error: Lost connection with the server
>>
>>
> * workaroundable via symlink version number truncation bug
>
Thanks for your reply, Curt, but we appear to speak different languages ;)

WVSVNTB?

could you please reduce the brevity of your solution?

Cheers, Tony

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-10 13:30 +0100
  Re: unison compatibility in stretch Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2017-12-10 15:10 +0100
  Re: unison compatibility in stretch "Juan R. de Silva" <juan.r.d.silva@gmail.com> - 2017-12-10 16:40 +0100
  Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-10 20:50 +0100
    Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-11 11:40 +0100
      Re: unison compatibility in stretch Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-12 10:00 +0100
        Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-12 11:20 +0100
          Re: unison compatibility in stretch Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-12 13:40 +0100
          Re: unison compatibility in stretch David Margerison <deltam@electrosonics.com.au> - 2017-12-12 15:10 +0100
      Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-12 13:00 +0100
        Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 14:00 +0100
          Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-13 14:40 +0100
            Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 15:10 +0100
              Re: unison compatibility in stretch Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-12-13 16:50 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 17:50 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2017-12-13 18:40 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-13 18:50 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Tony van der Hoff <lists@vanderhoff.org> - 2017-12-29 12:30 +0100
                Re: unison compatibility in stretch Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2017-12-29 17:10 +0100

csiph-web