Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #188247
| From | Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? |
| Date | 2017-10-24 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uEaSe-5Aa-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uCwDv-7aA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uD4OS-39M-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 16:34:23 +0100 Roger Lynn <Roger@rilynn.me.uk> wrote: > On 20/10/17 05:00, Celejar wrote: > > The description of the imagemagick package (8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-11+deb9u1) > > on my Stable system includes the statements: > > > > "This is a dummy package. You can safely purge or remove it." > > > > But trying to remove it rips out cups, because: > > > > ~$ aptitude why imagemagick > > i cups Depends cups-filters (>= 1.0.24-3~) > > i A cups-filters Depends imagemagick (>= 6.4~) > > > > What gives? > > imagemagick can only be removed when nothing depends on it. > imagemagick-6.q16 has been marked as replacing imagemagick, so most packages > which depend on imagemagick will automatically use imagemagick-6.q16. > However some packages, including cups-filters, depend on particular versions > of imagemagick and the automatic replacement doesn't appear to work in this > case. > > You will only be able to remove imagemagick when cups-filters' dependencies > are updated or imagemagick-6.q16 finds a better way of declaring that it > provides imagemagick. > > The :386 packages are irrelevant and only need installing in very specific > circumstances. Thanks for the explanation. So this is basically a bug in cups-filter, which is insisting that it depends on a dummy package when it really doesn't? Celejar
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-20 06:00 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-20 10:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-20 19:10 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-20 23:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-23 02:50 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-23 12:00 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Roger Lynn <Roger@rilynn.me.uk> - 2017-10-23 22:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 01:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-10-24 02:20 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 04:20 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2017-10-24 03:10 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 01:20 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-24 09:00 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 19:10 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-29 13:00 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-10-29 13:30 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-30 03:50 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2017-10-30 11:20 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-30 16:00 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-30 16:10 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-30 18:40 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Roger Lynn <Roger@rilynn.me.uk> - 2017-10-21 18:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 19:10 +0200
csiph-web