Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #188230
| From | Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? |
| Date | 2017-10-24 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uDWYV-5lz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <uDz6h-6Z6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDHGy-4bm-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDRwd-1V1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDUkp-3CI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDV6N-48F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:09:59 -0400 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> wrote: > On 2017-10-23 at 19:24, Celejar wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 20:23:46 +0100 Roger Lynn <Roger@rilynn.me.uk> > > wrote: > > > >> On 23/10/17 11:00, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > >> > >>> Since I use a pure 64-bit system, I overlooked that only one of > >>> imagemagick-6.q16 or imagemagick-6.q16:i386 can be installed. I > >>> think it's better to re-install imagemagick-6.q16. And then show > >>> the output when trying to purge imagemagick, please. I think > >>> there must be involved a i386 version of some cups package. > >> > >> Celejar answered the question in the first post. It's very simple: > >> imagemagick can not be removed because cups-filters depends on it. > > > > Okay, but why do packages depend on other packages that declare that > > they are dummies and can be safely removed? Is this a bug in the > > dummy package' description, or in the package that has the > > dependency, or just unclear / misleading terminology? > > Generally (though perhaps not universally), the dummy package was not > originally a dummy, but was split out into two or more separate packages > and now exists only to aid the transition to those new packages. > > In other words, it's usually for historical reasons. > > Failures like the one you're looking at crop up when other packages > haven't yet been updated to depend on the new packages instead of the > old one. So should I file a bug against the other packages? Celejar
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-20 06:00 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-20 10:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-20 19:10 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-20 23:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-23 02:50 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-23 12:00 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Roger Lynn <Roger@rilynn.me.uk> - 2017-10-23 22:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 01:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-10-24 02:20 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 04:20 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2017-10-24 03:10 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 01:20 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-24 09:00 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 19:10 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-29 13:00 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-10-29 13:30 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-30 03:50 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2017-10-30 11:20 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-30 16:00 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2017-10-30 16:10 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-30 18:40 +0100
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Roger Lynn <Roger@rilynn.me.uk> - 2017-10-21 18:30 +0200
Re: Can imagemagick really be safely purged or removed? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 19:10 +0200
csiph-web