Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #187970
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Delayed list posts [Was: Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed |
| Date | 2017-10-17 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uBAzw-2ZF-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <uAVcZ-16P-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uBlAu-1ah-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uBlAu-1ah-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uBwFz-mm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uBx8B-Mu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue 17 Oct 2017 at 21:02:39 +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 16.10.17 22:12, Glen B wrote: > > You’re going to get an e-mail from me in ~10 hours or so saying I > > fixed it; for some reason, this mailing list is delaying my emails by > > about 24 hours. So much for speedy technology! > > It was 25.4 hrs for your message: > > X-Greylist: delayed 91420 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bendel; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:53:30 > UTC > > The reason might just be: > > (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (not verified)) > by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BBC876 > for <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Whatever the significance of the "delayed 91420 seconds", 25.4 hours was not the time between the mail being sent and the list software sending it out. That is closer to 11 hours (not 17.5 hours as I said previously). As I understand greylisting, the client first has the mail rejected and then has to try later, the default time interval for a retry generally being 300 seconds. Perhaps mail.protection.outlook.com uses a different IP address each time. That wouldn't go down well. -- Brian.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2017-10-15 19:50 +0200
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2017-10-17 00:00 +0200
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2017-10-17 11:50 +0200
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed tomas@tuxteam.de - 2017-10-17 12:30 +0200
Re: system d process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-10-17 12:40 +0200
Re: system d process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-10-17 12:30 +0200
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 15:20 +0200
Delayed list posts [Was: Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2017-10-17 12:20 +0200
Re: Delayed list posts [Was: Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-10-17 16:00 +0200
Re: Delayed list posts [Was: Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2017-10-17 18:20 +0200
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-10-17 12:20 +0200
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 15:10 +0200
D-Bus (Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed) Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2017-10-17 15:40 +0200
Re: D-Bus (Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed) Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 16:40 +0200
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-10-17 16:30 +0200
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2017-10-17 12:50 +0200
Re: systemd process(es) consuming CPU when laptop lid closed David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2017-10-18 18:40 +0200
csiph-web