Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1701995
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kvm: svm: Add support for additional SVM NPF error codes |
| Date | 2017-08-02 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u9ZnY-it-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <u9l7c-82B-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9l7c-82B-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9paO-2ga-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9paO-2ga-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9ZnY-it-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/08/2017 15:36, Brijesh Singh wrote: >> >> The flow is: >> >> hardware walks page table; L2 page table points to read only memory >> -> pf_interception (code = >> -> kvm_handle_page_fault (need_unprotect = false) >> -> kvm_mmu_page_fault >> -> paging64_page_fault (for example) >> -> try_async_pf >> map_writable set to false >> -> paging64_fetch(write_fault = true, map_writable = false, >> prefault = false) >> -> mmu_set_spte(speculative = false, host_writable = false, >> write_fault = true) >> -> set_spte >> mmu_need_write_protect returns true >> return true >> write_fault == true -> set emulate = true >> return true >> return true >> return true >> emulate >> >> Without this patch, emulation would have called >> >> ..._gva_to_gpa_nested >> -> translate_nested_gpa >> -> paging64_gva_to_gpa >> -> paging64_walk_addr >> -> paging64_walk_addr_generic >> set fault (nested_page_fault=true) >> >> and then: >> >> kvm_propagate_fault >> -> nested_svm_inject_npf_exit >> > > maybe then safer thing would be to qualify the new error_code check with > !mmu_is_nested(vcpu) or something like that. So that way it would run on > L1 guest, and not the L2 guest. I believe that would restrict it avoid > hitting this case. Are you okay with this change ? Or check "vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map"? That would be true when not using shadow pages. > IIRC, the main place where this check was valuable was when L1 guest had > a fault (when coming out of the L2 guest) and emulation was not needed. How do I measure the effect? I tried counting the number of emulations, and any difference from the patch was lost in noise. Paolo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kvm: svm: Add support for additional SVM NPF error codes Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-07-31 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kvm: svm: Add support for additional SVM NPF error codes Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-07-31 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kvm: svm: Add support for additional SVM NPF error codes Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-08-02 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kvm: svm: Add support for additional SVM NPF error codes Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-08-04 16:10 +0200
csiph-web