Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1697565

Re: nowait aio return value

From Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: nowait aio return value
Date 2017-07-26 23:20 +0200
Message-ID <u7BSN-5zh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <u7zxD-3Wx-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Jason,

On 07/26/2017 01:45 PM, Jason Baron wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In testing nowait aio on ext4, I found that when appending to a file
> the return value is EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK, because as mentioned in the
> commit this will potentially trigger an allocation. However, the EAGAIN,
> seems somewhat misleading to me, in that if I continuously try the
> write, it will never succeed.
> 
> The relevant commit is:
> 728fbc0 ext4: nowait aio support
> 
> As you can see there, failure to get the inode lock is treated as
> EAGAIN, which seems more appropriate to me, as its very likely
> to succeed on subsequent calls.
> 
> Perhaps, it could be switched to -EINVAL, or something else?
> 

Thanks for testing this.

I would suggest read it as -EWOULDBLOCK. The idea is to pass on
IOCB_NOWAIT when we don't want the I/O process to wait, and if it does
return -EWOULDBLOCK. If it returns EWOULDBLOCK in case of allocation,
you may want to allocate your file space before performing the I/O.

I would return EINVAL in case the parameters passed are incorrect.

-- 
Goldwyn

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

nowait aio return value Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> - 2017-07-26 20:50 +0200
  Re: nowait aio return value Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de> - 2017-07-26 23:20 +0200

csiph-web