Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1697565
| From | Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: nowait aio return value |
| Date | 2017-07-26 23:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7BSN-5zh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u7zxD-3Wx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Jason, On 07/26/2017 01:45 PM, Jason Baron wrote: > Hi, > > In testing nowait aio on ext4, I found that when appending to a file > the return value is EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK, because as mentioned in the > commit this will potentially trigger an allocation. However, the EAGAIN, > seems somewhat misleading to me, in that if I continuously try the > write, it will never succeed. > > The relevant commit is: > 728fbc0 ext4: nowait aio support > > As you can see there, failure to get the inode lock is treated as > EAGAIN, which seems more appropriate to me, as its very likely > to succeed on subsequent calls. > > Perhaps, it could be switched to -EINVAL, or something else? > Thanks for testing this. I would suggest read it as -EWOULDBLOCK. The idea is to pass on IOCB_NOWAIT when we don't want the I/O process to wait, and if it does return -EWOULDBLOCK. If it returns EWOULDBLOCK in case of allocation, you may want to allocate your file space before performing the I/O. I would return EINVAL in case the parameters passed are incorrect. -- Goldwyn
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
nowait aio return value Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> - 2017-07-26 20:50 +0200 Re: nowait aio return value Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de> - 2017-07-26 23:20 +0200
csiph-web