Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1695725
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] arm64: disable irq between breakpoint and step exception |
| Date | 2017-07-25 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u784q-3jY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u0Af7-3Q5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u0Af8-3Q5-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:34:00PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > If an interrupt is generated between breakpoint and step handler then > step handler can not get correct step address. This situation can easily > be invoked by samples/hw_breakpoint/data_breakpoint.c. It can also be > reproduced if we insert any printk() statement or dump_stack() in perf > overflow_handler. So, it seems that perf is working fine just luckily. > If the CPU which is handling perf breakpoint handler receives any > interrupt then, perf step handler will not execute sanely. > > This patch improves do_debug_exception() handling, which enforces now, > that exception handler function: > - should return 0 for any software breakpoint and hw > breakpoint/watchpoint handler if it does not expect a single step stage > - should return 1 if it expects single step. > - A single step handler should always return 0. > - All handler should return a -ve error in any other case. > > Now, we can know in do_debug_exception() that whether a step exception > will be followed or not. If there will a step exception then disable > irq. Re-enable it after single step handling. AFAICT, this is only a problem for kernel-mode breakpoints where we end up stepping into the interrupt handler when trying to step over a breakpoint. We'd probably be better off getting all users of kernel step (kprobes, kgdb and perf) to run the step with irqs disabled, but I still have reservations about that: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-May/508066.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-June/510814.html Wouldn't it be better to follow kprobes/kgdb and have perf run the step with irqs disabled? Will
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] arm64: disable irq between breakpoint and step exception Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-07-25 15:30 +0200 Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] arm64: disable irq between breakpoint and step exception Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> - 2017-07-26 07:40 +0200
csiph-web