Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #613658
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence |
| Date | 2023-06-24 15:28 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <u77qms$7fln$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <82dcd740-2e36-4612-a43f-6e516ffd53e9n@googlegroups.com> <u77fme$1tuf0$1@paganini.bofh.team> <fee1e2c8-3720-42a6-ad05-105b932bad2fn@googlegroups.com> <u77qbm$1v3go$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 6/24/2023 3:22 PM, Hoang Kouman wrote: > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> it has nothing to do with unity. >> >> Unity and one are the first integer. >> They are built by an infinite sequence of the infinitesimal. > > no. Your 0.(9) is *_never_* an integer. It stays in the description. .999... is not an integer, however it has a limit of one. None of its iterates in a step-by-step process can never equal. However: 1 / 9 * 9 = 1 1 / 9 = .111... base 10 .111... * 9 = 1 Think in base 10 > Go read. Why did you emigrated as an immigrant in america? Miserable, > shameless, soulless hypocrites. The Nazis have been crushed and > Washington's hopes now rest on Wagner...how cowardly! > > That is bloody nonsense... They were hoping to reach out to Prigizhinand > use him as one of their useful idiots like Zelensky... > > Never seen such rats, they never miss any opportunities even if its their > worst enemy, what a shameless country, no honor, no value > > The damage that Prigozhin did to the reputation of Wagner in Russia and > Russian allies is colossal. This plays right into the notion that the > rebellion by Prigozhin and his small Wagner supportes was a Western > operation. > > > *_US_delays_Wagner_sanctions_after_insurrection_* – WSJ > Washington reportedly did not want to be seen as siding with Vladimir > Putin > https://%72t.com/news/578638-us-delays-wagner-sanctions/ > > disgusting satanists. Just another proof. Those fucking states are united > in fascism. Here you have it plainly. > *_They_need_a_traitor_to_win_a_war_*. What a disgrace.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Brennan Otten <nnna@nebnrnea.ea> - 2023-06-24 19:20 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Hoang Kouman <gago@hhngnaoa.om> - 2023-06-24 22:22 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 15:28 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bennett Sniders <rtne@etnnneis.bn> - 2023-06-24 23:28 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:53 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:58 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Deandre Romijnsen <dsrm@nnrderee.ds> - 2023-06-26 21:36 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:57 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bernard Bueren <buur@enbeebdn.ru> - 2023-06-25 08:00 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-25 17:50 +0200
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:47 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 08:28 +0200
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 09:46 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 23:56 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 09:37 +0200
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 10:37 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 14:00 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 10:07 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-28 14:16 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Devoise Kool <ovve@sdodevlv.el> - 2023-06-28 21:56 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Vlademire Ramaker <arde@rekeadem.ae> - 2023-06-25 19:18 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 17:54 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Nikki Cann <nika@kinianka.ka> - 2023-06-25 22:06 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:15 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 18:30 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 08:28 +0200
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Shan Kloeten <ntne@ntnnstke.sn> - 2023-06-26 06:45 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Barton Houtem <otub@ahutnaee.eb> - 2023-06-26 06:58 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:24 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 12:47 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Buddy Oorschot <ocuo@codhudoh.to> - 2023-06-25 20:22 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:20 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Geosvani Peter <ogtv@asvsegtg.vp> - 2023-06-25 21:30 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:51 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Dustan Rademaker <mdrn@eurttrrn.de> - 2023-06-25 22:16 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:18 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Lemuel Marqueringh <argr@hqqgugqi.lr> - 2023-06-25 22:57 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 00:19 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Markeen Schenck <ecme@kckhhkkc.kn> - 2023-06-26 07:09 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 12:58 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Germaine Breda <eraa@gmeenmad.dr> - 2023-06-26 22:37 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Morris Offermans <oeoe@ssoaanmf.sr> - 2023-06-26 07:22 +0000
A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-26 14:23 -0500
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-06-26 12:57 -0700
Re: A Little Insight nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 09:37 +0200
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating Foster Smeets <fste@sstffsem.ee> - 2023-06-26 21:14 +0000
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 00:03 -0400
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Connor Maas <naoa@nnsamoss.co> - 2023-06-26 21:27 +0000
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 23:58 -0400
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-26 23:43 -0500
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Valery Schuyler <evrl@leerrael.hc> - 2023-06-27 11:48 +0000
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-27 14:37 -0500
Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Houston Beek <nnoo@bbookeon.ub> - 2023-06-27 22:23 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:20 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ezra Venn <rene@nvanarvz.vn> - 2023-06-25 22:49 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Duncan Antwerp <anec@cnancrwp.ca> - 2023-06-26 22:20 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 19:43 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 19:48 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maron Andel <nado@eredlemn.rl> - 2023-06-26 22:25 +0000
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:05 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:08 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:10 -0700
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:32 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:20 -0400
Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maxie Snider <eida@esxnnrxd.is> - 2023-06-25 08:06 +0000
csiph-web