Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #603139

Re: A simple argument. Acceptable?

From FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups sci.math
Subject Re: A simple argument. Acceptable?
Date 2023-06-24 10:15 -0400
Organization Peripheral Visions
Message-ID <u76tql$4jed$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <d2947a85-f7a2-42af-8c2e-713edc22f196n@googlegroups.com> <4ad00df4-faed-4018-bee2-97aaa5506bf4n@googlegroups.com> <29a18a60-b707-46d7-85ed-32b100d6694en@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

WM explained on 6/24/2023 :
> Eram semper recta schrieb am Samstag, 24. Juni 2023 um 14:29:13 UTC+2:
>> On Friday, 23 June 2023 at 07:41:05 UTC-4, WM wrote: 
>>> We assume that all endsegments E(n) = {n, n+1, n+2, ...} of natural numbers 
>>> are visible and infinite and have an empty intersection. Then there exists 
>>> at least one visible endsegment E(k) containing at least one natural number 
>>> j ≥ k that is not in at least one of its predecessors. 
>>> 
>>> Acceptable?
>
>> Yes, your claim is 100% correct. 
>
> Thank you. It is relieving to see that intelligent persons can understand. I 
> am sure my students will become educated as well.

Two math idiots agreeing about some numbers being 'visible' makes no 
sense.

Different infinite sets of natural numbers (endsegments) are not equal 
except in cardinality. Not all symbols are in each set, and as such 
those 'missing' symbols cannot be in the intersection.

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 04:41 -0700
  Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 05:09 -0700
  Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 05:12 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 09:58 -0700
  Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 07:10 -0700
  Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 07:12 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 07:25 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 09:56 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Eram semper recta <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 05:31 -0700
  Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-23 11:54 -0400
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 09:59 -0700
      Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-23 15:48 -0400
        Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 06:04 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:11 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 05:59 -0700
      Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 10:07 -0400
      Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-24 12:04 -0400
        Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 10:43 -0700
          Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 10:50 -0700
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 08:55 -0700
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:38 -0700
          Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-25 10:16 -0400
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:04 -0700
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:51 -0700
        Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 08:59 -0700
          Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-25 16:19 -0400
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:42 -0700
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:49 -0700
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 16:10 -0400
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-26 17:02 -0400
      Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 10:22 -0700
        Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:01 -0700
          Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:42 -0700
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:35 -0700
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 16:15 -0400
          Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 13:24 -0700
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:43 -0700
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 18:57 -0700
                Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 19:08 -0700
                Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-06-26 22:35 -0400
                Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 10:34 -0700
                Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 11:54 -0700
                Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 05:45 -0700
                Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 12:47 -0700
                Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 05:45 -0700
                Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 08:01 -0700
          Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 05:28 -0700
  Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 11:51 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Eram semper recta <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 05:34 -0700
  Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Eram semper recta <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 05:29 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 06:08 -0700
      Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 10:15 -0400
        Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 08:52 -0700
          Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 12:06 -0400
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:56 -0700
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 17:42 -0400
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:38 -0700
                Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 16:17 -0400
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:26 -0700
              Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 16:25 -0400
          Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 09:35 -0700
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:30 -0700
      Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Eram semper recta <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 16:23 -0700
        Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:48 -0700
  Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Eram semper recta <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 05:19 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 08:12 -0700
      Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Eram semper recta <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 08:42 -0700
        Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 08:57 -0700
          Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:01 -0700
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 16:27 -0400
            Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 02:55 -0700
    Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:52 -0700
      Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 03:06 -0700
        Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 04:20 -0700
        Re: A simple argument. Acceptable? FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-27 11:30 -0400

csiph-web