Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1685284
| From | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm -v2 2/6] mm, swap: Add swap readahead hit statistics |
| Date | 2017-07-11 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u2854-5KF-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tXTeh-7bI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tXTei-7bI-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 06/29/2017 06:44 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>
> static atomic_t swapin_readahead_hits = ATOMIC_INIT(4);
> +static atomic_long_t swapin_readahead_hits_total = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +static atomic_long_t swapin_readahead_total = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>
> void show_swap_cache_info(void)
> {
> @@ -305,8 +307,10 @@ struct page * lookup_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
>
> if (page && likely(!PageTransCompound(page))) {
> INC_CACHE_INFO(find_success);
> - if (TestClearPageReadahead(page))
> + if (TestClearPageReadahead(page)) {
> atomic_inc(&swapin_readahead_hits);
> + atomic_long_inc(&swapin_readahead_hits_total);
> + }
> }
Adding global atomics that we touch in hot paths seems like poor
future-proofing. Are we sure we want to do this and not use some of the
nice, fancy, percpu counters that we have?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH -mm -v2 2/6] mm, swap: Add swap readahead hit statistics Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-07-11 20:30 +0200 Re: [PATCH -mm -v2 2/6] mm, swap: Add swap readahead hit statistics "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2017-07-12 04:30 +0200
csiph-web