Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1684514
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 4.9 04/41] ceph: choose readdir frag based on previous readdir reply |
| Date | 2017-07-10 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u1KFu-7Ua-69@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u1KvL-7Qx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yan, Zheng <zyan@redhat.com>
commit b50c2de51e611da90cf3cf04c058f7e9bbe79e93 upstream.
The dirfragtree is lazily updated, it's not always accurate. Infinite
loops happens in following circumstance.
- client send request to read frag A
- frag A has been fragmented into frag B and C. So mds fills the reply
with contents of frag B
- client wants to read next frag C. ceph_choose_frag(frag value of C)
return frag A.
The fix is using previous readdir reply to calculate next readdir frag
when possible.
Signed-off-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ceph/dir.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ceph/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/dir.c
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static int ceph_readdir(struct file *fil
struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc = fsc->mdsc;
int i;
int err;
- u32 ftype;
+ unsigned frag = -1;
struct ceph_mds_reply_info_parsed *rinfo;
dout("readdir %p file %p pos %llx\n", inode, file, ctx->pos);
@@ -362,7 +362,6 @@ more:
/* do we have the correct frag content buffered? */
if (need_send_readdir(fi, ctx->pos)) {
struct ceph_mds_request *req;
- unsigned frag;
int op = ceph_snap(inode) == CEPH_SNAPDIR ?
CEPH_MDS_OP_LSSNAP : CEPH_MDS_OP_READDIR;
@@ -373,8 +372,11 @@ more:
}
if (is_hash_order(ctx->pos)) {
- frag = ceph_choose_frag(ci, fpos_hash(ctx->pos),
- NULL, NULL);
+ /* fragtree isn't always accurate. choose frag
+ * based on previous reply when possible. */
+ if (frag == (unsigned)-1)
+ frag = ceph_choose_frag(ci, fpos_hash(ctx->pos),
+ NULL, NULL);
} else {
frag = fpos_frag(ctx->pos);
}
@@ -497,6 +499,7 @@ more:
struct ceph_mds_reply_dir_entry *rde = rinfo->dir_entries + i;
struct ceph_vino vino;
ino_t ino;
+ u32 ftype;
BUG_ON(rde->offset < ctx->pos);
@@ -519,15 +522,17 @@ more:
ctx->pos++;
}
+ ceph_mdsc_put_request(fi->last_readdir);
+ fi->last_readdir = NULL;
+
if (fi->next_offset > 2) {
- ceph_mdsc_put_request(fi->last_readdir);
- fi->last_readdir = NULL;
+ frag = fi->frag;
goto more;
}
/* more frags? */
if (!ceph_frag_is_rightmost(fi->frag)) {
- unsigned frag = ceph_frag_next(fi->frag);
+ frag = ceph_frag_next(fi->frag);
if (is_hash_order(ctx->pos)) {
loff_t new_pos = ceph_make_fpos(ceph_frag_value(frag),
fi->next_offset, true);
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 4.9 00/41] 4.9.37-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-10 19:30 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 02/41] fs: completely ignore unknown open flags Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-10 19:30 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 01/41] fs: add a VALID_OPEN_FLAGS Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-10 19:30 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 03/41] driver core: platform: fix race condition with driver_override Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-10 19:30 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 05/41] tracing/kprobes: Allow to create probe with a module name starting with a digit Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-10 19:30 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 19/41] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7794: Swap ATA signals Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-10 19:30 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 04/41] ceph: choose readdir frag based on previous readdir reply Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-10 19:30 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 08/41] usb: dwc3: replace %p with %pK Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-10 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/41] 4.9.37-stable review Krister Johansen <kjlx@templeofstupid.com> - 2017-07-11 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/41] 4.9.37-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-11 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/41] 4.9.37-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-07-11 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/41] 4.9.37-stable review Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> - 2017-07-11 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/41] 4.9.37-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-11 12:40 +0200
csiph-web