Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1681922
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler |
| Date | 2017-07-06 00:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u017H-3ZA-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <tUuFs-2G9-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUONQ-7dN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUQPF-6J-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <tVFyN-86y-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <u00Ol-3Tl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Shubham Bansal > <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Russell,Daniel and Kees, >> >> I am attaching the latest patch with this mail. It included support >> for BPF_CALL | BPF_JMP tested with and without constant blinding on >> ARMv7 machine. >> Due to the limitation on my machine I can't test the tail call. It >> would be a great help if any of you could help me with this. > > Is this just a matter of running test_bpf? If so: Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [287/308 JIT'ed] -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-06 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-06 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 06:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-07 06:50 +0200
csiph-web