Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #820314
| From | Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#861025: "sangs" should not be in the English dictionary |
| Date | 2017-04-23 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tzwiR-4TQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Package: scowl
Version: 2017.01.22-1
Severity: normal
The English dictionary includes the word "sangs". I can't find any
evidence suggesting that this is a word in English, based on several
different dictionaries. ("sang" is a word, but not one with a plural
like that.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
(x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
-- no debconf information
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#861025: "sangs" should not be in the English dictionary Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2017-04-23 22:30 +0200
Bug#861025: "sangs" should not be in the English dictionary Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2017-04-25 00:10 +0200
Bug#861025: "sangs" should not be in the English dictionary Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2017-04-26 12:10 +0200
csiph-web