Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1628818
| From | Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH] tango_nand.c: fix ecc.stats_corrected in empty flash case |
| Date | 2017-04-22 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tz0M2-1LO-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <txWKu-3m5-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <ty5b4-8qb-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyDFL-4xX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyGWZ-6mH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyH6G-6q7-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Fix ecc.stats_corrected in empty flash case. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> --- This was suggested by Boris Brezillon in another context. Not tested; I don't have the hardware. diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/tango_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/tango_nand.c index 4a5e948..db4bff4 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/tango_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/tango_nand.c @@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ static int check_erased_page(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 *buf) chip->ecc.strength); if (res < 0) mtd->ecc_stats.failed++; + else + mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += res; bitflips = max(res, bitflips); buf += pkt_size; -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-04-19 14:20 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2017-04-19 23:20 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-04-20 00:20 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2017-04-20 00:30 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-04-20 13:50 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2017-04-20 14:20 +0200
[PATCH] nand_base: optimize checking of erased buffers Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-04-21 13:00 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-04-21 12:10 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2017-04-21 12:20 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2017-04-21 14:10 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-04-21 15:40 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2017-04-21 15:50 +0200
Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-04-22 09:10 +0200
[PATCH] tango_nand.c: fix ecc.stats_corrected in empty flash case Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-04-22 12:50 +0200
tango_nand: is logic right in error cases? (was Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC?) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-04-23 12:00 +0200
Re: tango_nand: is logic right in error cases? (was Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC?) Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2017-04-24 09:20 +0200
csiph-web