Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1628165
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 06/11] drbd: use bio_clone_fast() instead of bio_clone() |
| Date | 2017-04-21 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tyF4S-5fu-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tyd8C-4Wq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyd8D-4Wq-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:38:49PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > drbd does not modify the bi_io_vec of the cloned bio, > so there is no need to clone that part. So bio_clone_fast() > is the better choice. > For bio_clone_fast() we need to specify a bio_set. > We could use fs_bio_set, which bio_clone() uses, or > drbd_md_io_bio_set, which drbd uses for metadata, but it is > generally best to avoid sharing bio_sets unless you can > be certain that there are no interdependencies. > > So create a new bio_set, drbd_io_bio_set, and use bio_clone_fast(). > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> All the zeroing of the gblobal variable looks unessecary / stupid. But given that the surrounding code already does it: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > + bio = bio_clone_fast(bio_src, GFP_NOIO, drbd_io_bio_set); /* XXX cannot fail!! */ but maybe I'd drop this comment..
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 06/11] drbd: use bio_clone_fast() instead of bio_clone() NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> - 2017-04-20 07:50 +0200 Re: [PATCH 06/11] drbd: use bio_clone_fast() instead of bio_clone() Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-04-21 13:40 +0200
csiph-web