Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1628079

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support

From Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support
Date 2017-04-21 11:30 +0200
Message-ID <tyD33-45V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tuprH-6qM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tupBn-6uA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tvrB9-5Bn-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <tvsdQ-64C-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Free Electrons

Show all headers | View raw


Hello,

On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:19:32 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> Yep. It was a compromise. By adding a new binding for the GPIO driver,
> this might be possible. But it did not seem worth such a major change.
> 
> The prime use of this feature is for controlling a fan. So far, i've
> not seen any hardware with more than one fan, i.e. needs more than one
> PWM. Nor have i seen any hardware with the GPIO for the fan being on
> the third bank. A hardware manufacture could add multiple fans, but i
> doubt it, they make noise and fail. And if a manufacture does place a
> fan on the third bank, it can still be controlled as a plain GPIO fan,
> as we have been doing for the last few years.

Right.

> So i personally think it is an O.K. compromise.

I clearly don't want to block this, but I believe this is a very good
illustration of why stable DT bindings simply don't work. We are
realizing here that having each GPIO bank represented as a separate DT
node doesn't work, because this blinking functionality is not per GPIO
bank, but global to all GPIO banks.

I am totally fine with compromise, and having things simple first, and
extend them later if needed. But this stable DT binding rule makes this
quite impossible: what is a compromise today might put you in big
troubles tomorrow.

Anyway, it's fine for me, I don't think it's worth the effort making a
much more complicated solution/change.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-04-12 16:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-04-12 17:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-04-21 11:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-04-24 11:20 +0200

csiph-web