Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.vote > #674
| From | Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.vote |
| Subject | Re: having public irc logs? |
| Date | 2017-04-09 07:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tudqx-73Y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ttbh9-6aP-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttbh8-6aP-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttTi9-2nO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Mehdi Dogguy dijo [Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 09:47:38AM +0200]: > To be honest, I also wondered why IRC channels were not logged when I > started contributing to Debian. Later, I understood that people used > IRC to communicate like they would do in real life. As such, we will > not try to record every conversation held between two contributors. I'm surprised nobody has said so far something along the following lines, which I feel to be quite obvious. Our goals by archiving our communications via mailing lists is not "just" to prove everything we do is done in public. A mailing list message is usually a self-sustaining piece of information, even as a part of a conversation. They are easy to situate, and our usual practices (i.e. inline quoting, preserving threading, the way we handle Cc and Reply-to, etc.) help make each bit of information meaningful and indexable. IRC is just a shouting room. OK, sometimes it's way quieter, but each channel just a stream of messages that hold very little "state" - If you try to reconstruct what was said in an IRC conversation, if anything, you will have the destinatary of some lines (as we hold the convention of starting a line with <nickname><colon>). IRC is great for live communication, but is a very very lousy referential or citational material. Of course, that's one of the main drivers behind bots such as Meetbot, which organizes what is said during a specific interval by adding topicality and salient points. Of course, Meetbot logs are publicly accessible.
Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
having public irc logs? Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> - 2017-04-06 10:50 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2017-04-06 12:00 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> - 2017-04-06 18:10 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> - 2017-04-07 10:00 +0200
use matrix.org if you want logs (was: having public irc logs?) martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> - 2017-04-07 10:10 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> - 2017-04-07 13:30 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> - 2017-04-07 16:40 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2017-04-08 10:00 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> - 2017-04-08 10:00 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2017-04-06 21:30 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> - 2017-04-08 08:00 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> - 2017-04-08 12:20 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> - 2017-04-09 10:50 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> - 2017-04-08 09:50 +0200
Re: having public irc logs? Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2017-04-09 07:20 +0200
csiph-web