Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1619759
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: Minor cleanups |
| Date | 2017-04-10 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tuDXI-7jz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <to9fY-1zG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tpDlE-r8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 27-03-17, 15:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:05:55PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here are few minor cleanups for the sched core. The first three tries to > > avoid reinitializing memory which is already set to zero and the last > > one drops an unused statement. > > > > I'm OK with the kzalloc/memset thing, I assume that you are fine with removal of memset as done in the first 3 patches. Or you are fine with just the first patch? > but I'd prefer to keep all those > other bits. > > Yes they're superfluous, but this is init code, so nobody cares about > performance and having those things explitic makes it easier to read. Sure. > As to the very latest patch, that's there so that if/when we extend that > array we can simply continue. Also its more symmetric/consistent. Any > half sane DCE pass should get rid of it anyway, as the result is unused. But we aren't going to extend the array all the time and keeping a statement like that just for symmetry doesn't sound that great :). Anyway, I will drop the last patch as you suggested. -- viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: Minor cleanups Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-10 11:40 +0200
csiph-web