Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1619130
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm -v3] mm, swap: Sort swap entries before free |
| Date | 2017-04-07 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ttJVv-4NF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ttvSx-3C4-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 14:49:01 +0800 "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote: > To reduce the lock contention of swap_info_struct->lock when freeing > swap entry. The freed swap entries will be collected in a per-CPU > buffer firstly, and be really freed later in batch. During the batch > freeing, if the consecutive swap entries in the per-CPU buffer belongs > to same swap device, the swap_info_struct->lock needs to be > acquired/released only once, so that the lock contention could be > reduced greatly. But if there are multiple swap devices, it is > possible that the lock may be unnecessarily released/acquired because > the swap entries belong to the same swap device are non-consecutive in > the per-CPU buffer. > > To solve the issue, the per-CPU buffer is sorted according to the swap > device before freeing the swap entries. Test shows that the time > spent by swapcache_free_entries() could be reduced after the patch. > > Test the patch via measuring the run time of swap_cache_free_entries() > during the exit phase of the applications use much swap space. The > results shows that the average run time of swap_cache_free_entries() > reduced about 20% after applying the patch. "20%" is useful info, but it is much better to present the absolute numbers, please. If it's "20% of one nanosecond" then the patch isn't very interesting. If it's "20% of 35 seconds" then we know we have more work to do. If there is indeed still a significant problem here then perhaps it would be better to move the percpu swp_entry_t buffer into the per-device structure swap_info_struct, so it becomes "per cpu, per device". That way we should be able to reduce contention further. Or maybe we do something else - it all depends upon the significance of this problem, which is why a full description of your measurements is useful.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH -mm -v3] mm, swap: Sort swap entries before free "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2017-04-07 08:50 +0200 Re: [PATCH -mm -v3] mm, swap: Sort swap entries before free Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2017-04-07 15:10 +0200 Re: [PATCH -mm -v3] mm, swap: Sort swap entries before free Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-04-07 23:50 +0200
csiph-web