Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] gpio: acpi: Even more tighten up ACPI GPIO lookups

From	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] gpio: acpi: Even more tighten up ACPI GPIO lookups
Date	2017-03-29 09:10 +0200
Message-ID	<tqfTY-3sX-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<togU9-6WV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <togUa-6WV-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tohnc-7os-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tq2k1-1UQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 07:31:24PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 13:12 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > The commit 10cf4899f8af ("gpiolib: tighten up ACPI legacy gpio
> > > lookups")
> > > prevents to getting same resource twice if the driver asks twice
> > > using same
> > 
> > s/same/different/
> > 
> > > connection ID.
> 
> Oh, yeah, though it didn't fix a potential issue described below.
> 
> > > But the whole idea of fallback might bring some problems. Imagine
> > > the case when
> > > we have two versions of BIOS/hardware where in one _DSD is
> > > introduced along
> > > with GPIO resources, but the other one uses just plain GPIO resource
> > > for
> > > another purpose
> > > 
> > > Case 1:
> > > 
> > >     Device (DEVX)
> > >     {
> > >         ...
> > >         Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate ()
> > >         {
> > >             GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly,
> > >                     "\\_SB.GPO0", 0, ResourceConsumer) {15}
> > >         })
> > >         Name (_DSD, Package ()
> > >         {
> > >             ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > >             Package ()
> > >             {
> > >                 Package () {"some-gpios", Package() {^DEVX, 0, 0, 0
> > > }},
> > >             }
> > >         })
> > >     }
> > > 
> > > Case 2:
> > > 
> > >     Device (DEVX)
> > >     {
> > >         ...
> > >         Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate ()
> > >         {
> > >             GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly,
> > >                     "\\_SB.GPO0", 0, ResourceConsumer) {27}
> > >         })
> > >     }
> > > 
> > > To prevent the possible misconfiguration tighten up even more ACPI
> > > GPIO lookups
> > > for case without connection ID provided.
> 
> > I wonder if this will break Goodix. Irina, Bastien?
> 
> It would be helpful if anyone can test it.
> 
> Btw, which particular driver do you have in mind that might be broken
> after such change? Ah, Goodix is a vendor of touchscreens, right?

Yes, and it uses named GPIOs.

-- 
Dmitry

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] gpio: acpi: Even more tighten up ACPI GPIO  lookups Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-28 18:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] gpio: acpi: Even more tighten up ACPI GPIO lookups Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 09:10 +0200

csiph-web