Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1608019
| From | Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge |
| Date | 2017-03-24 00:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tokEp-1ff-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <toaF5-2Eh-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <tobUu-3mq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <toepj-5id-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 23/03/2017 18:03, Mason wrote:
> The host bridge actually supports 256 MSIs.
>
> IIUC, what you suggested on IRC is that I support 256 in the driver,
> and only read the status for *enabled* MSIs.
>
> Pseudo-code:
>
> for every 32-bit blob in the enabled bitmap
> if the value is non-zero
> lookup the corresponding status reg
>
> Problem is that a BITMAP is unsigned long (as you point out below).
> So I'm not sure how to iterate 32-bits at a time over the BITMAP.
Something along these lines:
DECLARE_BITMAP(enabled, 256);
unsigned int pos = 0;
while ((pos = find_next_bit(enabled, 256, pos)) < 256) {
int offset = (pos / 32) * 4;
u32 status = readl_relaxed(status + offset);
/* Handle each pos set in status */
pos = round_up(pos, 32);
}
You mentioned a bug in my code (due to the platform endianness)
when passing the result of readl_relaxed to the bitops routine...
How is one supposed to iterate over status?
I'm not yet seeing this endianness issue, since (status & BIT(i))
provides the status of MSI_i, irrespective of endianness.
Although I see that arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h declares
BE and LE variants... I'm confused.
Regards.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-03-23 14:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-03-23 15:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-03-23 18:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-03-24 00:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-03-24 19:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-03-27 16:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-27 16:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-03-27 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-03-24 19:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-03-27 18:10 +0200
csiph-web