Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #179100

Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement?

From Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement?
Date 2017-03-21 14:40 +0100
Message-ID <tnsb0-3W4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <tnqiS-2Gb-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnqiS-2Gb-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnqLV-39H-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <tns1k-3SO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnsb0-3W4-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2017-03-21 14:27:38 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> >1. When I want to exclude some buggy packages. I often do this with
> >   aptitude, where major bugs can be reported by apt-listbugs.
> 
> apt also uses apt-listbugs...

Yes, but one can't exclude a package listed by apt-listbugs.
With aptitude, one just goes to the package and hits ":".

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2017-03-21 12:40 +0100
  Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Davor Balder <davor@cropakglobal.com> - 2017-03-21 12:50 +0100
  Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Intense Red <intnsred@golgotha.net> - 2017-03-21 13:00 +0100
  Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de> - 2017-03-21 13:10 +0100
    Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2017-03-21 14:30 +0100
      Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2017-03-21 14:40 +0100
        Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de> - 2017-03-21 14:50 +0100
        Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Nemeth Gyorgy <friczy@freemail.hu> - 2017-03-21 16:30 +0100
          Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2017-03-21 23:10 +0100
            Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Nemeth Gyorgy <friczy@freemail.hu> - 2017-03-22 08:00 +0100
              Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2017-03-22 12:20 +0100
      Re: aptitude is dangerous - any replacement? Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de> - 2017-03-21 14:40 +0100

csiph-web