Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1601569
| From | Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 10/14] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM) |
| Date | 2017-03-15 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tlkAW-2eY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <thkpQ-3cO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <thkpQ-3cO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlkrf-1Wi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> Il giorno 15 mar 2017, alle ore 17:56, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> ha scritto:
>
> On 03/04/2017 09:01 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> @@ -6330,7 +7012,41 @@ static void bfq_rq_enqueued(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
>>
>> static void __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq)
>> {
>> - struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq);
>> + struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq), *new_bfqq;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * An unplug may trigger a requeue of a request from the device
>> + * driver: make sure we are in process context while trying to
>> + * merge two bfq_queues.
>> + */
>> + if (!in_interrupt()) {
>
> What's the reason for this?
None :(
Just pre-existing, working code that I did not update, sorry.
> Don't use in_interrupt() to guide any of
> your decision making here.
>
Of course, sorry for these silly mistakes.
Thanks,
Paolo
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH RFC 10/14] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM) Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-03-15 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC 10/14] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM) Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> - 2017-03-15 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH RFC 10/14] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM) Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-03-15 22:10 +0100
csiph-web