Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1602213

Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release
Date 2017-03-16 13:10 +0100
Message-ID <tlCo9-6vs-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <tkWff-1T2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tkWyB-20n-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tkWyC-20n-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <tkYAr-3tR-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlkhA-1Qf-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:43:02PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -10346,6 +10346,17 @@ void perf_event_free_task(struct task_struct *task)
> >  			continue;
> >
> >  		mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
> > +		raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Destroy the task <-> ctx relation and mark the context dead.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * This is important because even though the task hasn't been
> > +		 * exposed yet the context has been (through child_list).
> > +		 */
> > +		RCU_INIT_POINTER(task->perf_event_ctxp[ctxn], NULL);
> > +		WRITE_ONCE(ctx->task, TASK_TOMBSTONE);
> > +		put_task_struct(task); /* cannot be last */
> > +		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
> 
> Agreed, this is what I had in mind. Although you know, I spent 3
> hours looking at your patch and I still can't convince myself I am
> really sure it closes all races ;)

Ha; yes I know that feeling. I used to have a few sheets of paper filled
with diagrams. Sadly I could not find them again. Must've been over
eager cleaning my desk at some point.

> 
> OK, I believe this is correct. And iiuc both RCU_INIT_POINTER(NULL)
> and put_task_struct() are not strictly necessary? At least until we
> add WARN_ON(tsk->usage != 2) before free_task() in copy process().

Right; I just kept the code similar to the other location. I even
considered making a helper function to not duplicate, but in the end
decided against it.

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is off-topic, but to me list_for_each_entry(event->child_list)
> in perf_event_release_kernel() looks very confusing and misleading.
> And list_first_entry_or_null(), we do not really need NULL if list
> is empty, tmp == child should be F even if we use list_first_entry().
> And given that we already have list_is_last(), it would be nice to
> add list_is_first() and cleanup perf_event_release_kernel() a bit:
> 

Agreed; its a bit of a weird one.

Let me go write proper patches for the things we have so far though.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-14 14:00 +0100
  Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-03-14 14:30 +0100
    Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-14 14:50 +0100
  Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-03-14 15:10 +0100
    Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-14 15:10 +0100
      Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-03-14 15:40 +0100
        Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-14 16:10 +0100
          Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-14 16:10 +0100
            Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-03-14 16:40 +0100
              Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-14 16:50 +0100
          Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-14 16:30 +0100
            Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-14 18:40 +0100
              Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-03-15 17:50 +0100
                Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-16 13:10 +0100
                Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-16 15:00 +0100
                Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-03-16 17:50 +0100
          Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-03-14 16:30 +0100

csiph-web