Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1599440

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that require multiple domains

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Jon,

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On 13/03/17 11:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> +Björn
>>
>> On 13 March 2017 at 10:37, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>> Looks like there is still some interest/needs in/for this. Any thoughts
>>> on how we can move this forward?
>>
>> At the Linaro Connect last week, I was talking to Björn, Rajendra and
>> Stephen more about these related issues.
>>
>> It definitely seems like we need to progress with this somehow,
>> meaning we need a solution for being able to associate a device with
>> more than one PM domain. In that context, I don't think genpd based on
>> its current design, is a good fit to solve the problem.
>>
>> Instead I think we need something entirely new (perhaps some code can
>> be borrowed from genpd), which is more similar to the clock/regulator
>> framework. In other words, what you also were suggesting in a earlier
>> reply.
>> In this way, the driver/subsystem gains full flexibility of managing
>> its device's PM domains, which seems like the best future-proof
>> solution.
>
> I agree, I think that that would give us the most flexibility to handle
> whatever scenario. However, I was thinking that we could still use the
> genpd core to register pm-domains with and control. My thought was to
> allow devices to have a bindings with multiple pm-domains ...
>
>         dev-xyz {
>                 ...
>                 power-domains = <&domain-a>, <&domain-b>;
>         };
>
> Then in the genpd core we do having something like ...
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index e697dec9d25b..d1ae6ddf4903 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -2026,6 +2026,15 @@ int genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev)
>                                                 "samsung,power-domain", 0);
>                 if (!pd_args.np)
>                         return -ENOENT;
> +       } else if (ret > 1) {
> +               /*
> +                * If there are more than one PM domain defined for a device,
> +                * then these need to be manually controlled by the device
> +                * driver because the genpd core cannot bind a device with

Which device driver?
The driver for the device that belongs to multiple PM domains?
The PM domain providers?

> +                * more than one PM domain.
> +                */
> +               dev_dbg(dev, "cannot add PM domains, %d detected!\n", ret);
> +               return 0;
>         }
>
> Then add some new public APIs for getting and controlling the pm-domains ...
>
> struct generic_pm_domain *pm_genpd_get(struct device *dev, char *name);
> - Use 'dev->of_node' to look-up pm-domain if populated, else uses name.
>
> struct generic_pm_domain *of_pm_genpd_get(struct device *dev, int index);
> void pm_genpd_put(struct generic_pm_domain *pd);
> int pm_genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *pd);
> int pm_genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *pd);
> - Power on/off APIs would be synchronous types
>
> Are there any potential pitfalls of the above?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that  require multiple domains Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2017-03-13 10:40 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that  require multiple domains Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2017-03-13 12:50 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that  require multiple domains Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2017-03-13 15:20 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that  require multiple domains Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-03-13 15:30 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that  require multiple domains Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2017-03-13 15:40 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that  require multiple domains Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-03-13 15:40 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that  require multiple domains Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2017-03-13 16:00 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for devices that  require multiple domains Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2017-03-13 15:50 +0100

csiph-web