Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally |
| Date | 2022-11-13 15:16 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <tkrmrm$1hd6l$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (25 earlier) <6FbcL.8759$ITE9.1469@fx40.iad> <tkrhnq$1cku$1@gioia.aioe.org> <eBccL.8760$ITE9.1742@fx40.iad> <tkrlcc$1hd6l$1@dont-email.me> <tkrm1b$1h0mj$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 11/13/2022 3:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/13/22 3:51 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 11/13/2022 2:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 11/13/22 2:49 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 11/13/2022 1:34 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 11/13/22 10:39 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/13/2022 7:00 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/13/22 12:04 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/12/2022 10:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/22 11:00 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/2022 8:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/22 8:31 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/2022 6:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/22 6:38 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/2022 4:55 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/22 5:33 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/2022 4:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/22 5:04 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/2022 3:25 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello. My name is Ben and I am an Olcottaholic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been 176 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since my last post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay strong, Richard. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made the essence of my work simple enough that only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expert knowledge of the C programming language is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required. H simulates its input using an x86 emulator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> void Infinite_Loop()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is an easily verified fact that Infinite_Loop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correctly simulated by H would never reach its own
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last instruction and terminate normally after 1 to ∞
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps of correct simulation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> void E(void (*x)())
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H(x, x);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is an easily verified fact that E correctly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulated by H would never reach its own last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction and terminate normally after 1 to ∞ steps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of correct simulation. E remains stuck in recursive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulation until aborted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since E can NOT be correctly simulated by H, that is an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> illogical statement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You must really have brain damage because you have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrected on the point many times. When H correctly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulates 1 to N steps of D, then one to N steps of D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are correctly simulated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When someone asks if I have any money then any amount of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money > 0 counts. It is not a lie for me to say yes when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have less than an infinite amount of money.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, how does a SINGLE H simulate this precise input for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from 1 to an infinte number of steps,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do we know that every element of the infinite set of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positive integers > 5 is an element of the infinite set of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integers > 3 ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once H correctly matches an infinite behavior pattern
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after N steps of correct simulation then H knows that D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correctly simulated by H will never reach its final state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and terminate normally in N to to ∞ steps of correct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because you can prove it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again you try to do proof by example, showing that you just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't understand what you are doing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe some day you will be enlightened into what you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> been doing wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> H can't prove the behavor of the D it is simulating because
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it needs to take into account that H(D,D) WILL return if H
>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes the steps it needs
>>>>>>>>>>>> void E(void (*x)())
>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>> H(x, x);
>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The simulated E never reaches its own final state whether or
>>>>>>>>>>>> not H ever aborts its simulation of E, thus E simulated by H
>>>>>>>>>>>> is by definition not halting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You say "Whether or not" which means you do not have a
>>>>>>>>>>> deinition for H, because when you define H you need to define
>>>>>>>>>>> its behavior
>>>>>>>>>> In the same way that we know that every integer > 5 is also > 3
>>>>>>>>>> H correctly determines the halt status of D for every H/D pair
>>>>>>>>>> such that
>>>>>>>>>> the H element of this H/D pair correctly simulates 1 to to ∞
>>>>>>>>>> steps of D.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How does that apply?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> H needs a SPECIFIC sequence of instructions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> H: Begin Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:15d4d1
>>>>>>>> Address_of_H:1383
>>>>>>>> [00001993][0015d4bd][0015d4c1] 55 push ebp
>>>>>>>> [00001994][0015d4bd][0015d4c1] 8bec mov ebp,esp
>>>>>>>> [00001996][0015d4b9][0014d48d] 51 push ecx
>>>>>>>> [00001997][0015d4b9][0014d48d] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
>>>>>>>> [0000199a][0015d4b5][00001993] 50 push eax // push P
>>>>>>>> [0000199b][0015d4b5][00001993] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
>>>>>>>> [0000199e][0015d4b1][00001993] 51 push ecx // push P
>>>>>>>> [0000199f][0015d4ad][000019a4] e8dff9ffff call 00001383 // call H
>>>>>>>> H: Infinitely Recursive Simulation Detected Simulation Stopped
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You and I both can see that D correctly simulated by every H of
>>>>>>>> the set of H/E pairs will never reach its final state and
>>>>>>>> terminate normally.
>>>>>>>> Why lie about this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, we know you are stupid and a liar because the call H must
>>>>>>> eventually result in a return of 0 since this run just shopwed
>>>>>>> that H(P,P) returns 0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have been told this many times and you ignore it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You told me that P simulated by H that never aborts its simulation
>>>>>> never stops running, thus from this we can correctly infer that no
>>>>>> P that has has had 1 to to ∞ steps correctly simulated by any H
>>>>>> ever reaches its own final state and terminates normally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you use the strawman deception to lie?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Right, but this H DOES abort its simulation, so that doesn't matter.
>>>>>
>>>> In other words you are saying that infinite loops specify a sequence
>>>> of configurations that terminate normally after a finite number of
>>>> steps of correct simulation.
>>>
>>> Nope, but the fact that you think that is what I said shows that you
>>> don't understand the material.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> void Infinite_Loop()
>>>> {
>>>> HERE: goto HERE;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> It is an easily verified fact that Infinite_Loop correctly simulated
>>>> by H would never reach its own last instruction and terminate
>>>> normally after 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation.
>>>
>>> No one denied that, so this is just more of your Red Herring.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> void E(void (*x)())
>>>> {
>>>> H(x, x);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> It is an easily verified fact that E correctly simulated by H would
>>>> never reach its own last instruction and terminate normally after 1
>>>> to ∞ steps of correct simulation. E remains stuck in recursive
>>>> simulation until aborted.
>>>
>>> But that isn't the question, since the H you claim is correct doesn't
>>> correctly simulate the input since it aborts it.
>>>
>>> The H that this E is built on DOESN'T correctly simulate its input
>>
>> _E()
>> [000019d2] 55 push ebp
>> [000019d3] 8bec mov ebp,esp
>> [000019d5] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
>> [000019d8] 50 push eax
>> [000019d9] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
>> [000019dc] 51 push ecx
>> [000019dd] e8b0f9ffff call 00001392
>> [000019e2] 83c408 add esp,+08
>> [000019e5] 5d pop ebp
>> [000019e6] c3 ret
>> Size in bytes:(0021) [000019e6]
>>
>> H: Begin Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:112b28
>> Address_of_H:1392
>> [000019d2][00112b14][00112b18] 55 push ebp
>> [000019d3][00112b14][00112b18] 8bec mov ebp,esp
>> [000019d5][00112b14][00112b18] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
>> [000019d8][00112b10][000019d2] 50 push eax // push E
>> [000019d9][00112b10][000019d2] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
>> [000019dc][00112b0c][000019d2] 51 push ecx // push E
>> [000019dd][00112b08][000019e2] e8b0f9ffff call 00001392 // call H
>> H: Infinitely Recursive Simulation Detected Simulation Stopped
>>
>> Since I already proved that H does correctly simulate E in that every
>> line of the execution trace of E simulated by H exactly matches a
>> corresponding line that the x86 source-code of E specifies, why do you
>> lie about this?
>>
> No, H does a correct PARTIAL simulation of its input.
>
> When you mention that a correct simulation not reaching the end implies
> non-halting, that means it needs to be a COMPLETE siulation, so your
> statement is just a LIE.
>
> You are being INTENTIONALLY deceptive with shifting definition.
>
>
>> The first seven lines of E are proven to be correctly simulated by H
>> and also prove that E correctly simulated by every H that can possibly
>> exist would never reach its own final state and terminate normally.
>>
>>
>
> And the "Simulation" of the "CALL" instruction is INCORRECT.
>
The seventh line of E simulated by H is the seventh line of the x86
source-code of E.
The simulation can only be incorrect when the execution trace of the
simulated E diverges from what the x86 source-code of E specifies, thus
you lie again. Why do you insist on lying about easily verified facts?
--
Copyright 2022 Pete Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit;
Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 09:28 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 10:57 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-11 18:36 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 13:43 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 13:16 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 14:30 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 13:39 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 16:07 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 15:15 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 16:44 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-11 21:54 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 16:44 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 18:25 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-11 23:55 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 17:59 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 19:24 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 18:46 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 21:15 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 20:35 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 21:45 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 20:48 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 21:56 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 22:00 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 09:02 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 08:43 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 10:06 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 15:12 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 10:52 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 10:20 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 11:47 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 22:17 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 09:08 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 08:55 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 10:02 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 14:09 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 09:32 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 14:41 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 09:52 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 15:03 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 10:26 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 15:38 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 10:59 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 10:06 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 11:21 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 09:50 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 11:26 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 11:00 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 12:59 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 12:16 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 13:24 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 18:42 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 14:00 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 19:26 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-12 13:37 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 14:54 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-12 12:45 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 13:57 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-12 13:04 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 14:21 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 13:36 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 15:01 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-12 14:07 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 15:26 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-12 14:35 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 16:28 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 15:59 -0600
Olcottaholics anonymous Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-11-12 21:25 +0000
E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-12 16:04 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 17:26 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 16:33 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 17:55 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 17:38 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 19:02 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 19:31 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 21:30 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 22:00 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 23:38 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-12 23:04 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 08:00 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-13 09:39 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 14:34 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-13 13:49 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 15:38 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 14:51 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2022-11-13 16:02 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 15:16 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 16:59 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 16:08 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-13 22:25 +0000
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Dennis Bush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 14:33 -0800
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 16:42 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 18:14 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 17:26 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-13 23:52 +0000
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-13 18:00 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 19:33 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 19:29 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-14 19:27 +0000
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-14 13:44 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-14 21:53 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-14 21:53 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-15 17:45 +0000
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-15 12:00 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-16 20:04 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-17 17:14 +0000
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-17 11:25 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 17:36 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 19:36 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 18:07 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-13 23:30 +0000
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 19:37 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl> - 2022-11-14 11:02 +0100
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2022-11-14 03:44 -0800
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2022-11-14 16:17 +0000
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-11-14 11:34 -0700
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-14 13:20 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-14 21:53 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-14 20:00 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-14 21:52 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 18:04 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 17:20 -0600
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-13 19:43 -0500
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-13 05:40 +0000
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-13 04:17 +0000
Re: E correctly simulated by H would never reach its last instruction and terminate normally olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 12:35 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 18:19 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 13:33 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 09:51 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 14:50 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 16:37 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 18:20 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 17:39 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 18:48 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 18:05 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 19:29 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 18:51 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 21:25 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 20:36 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 21:51 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 20:57 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-11 22:25 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 21:36 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 09:11 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2022-11-11 12:56 -0700
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 14:19 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2022-11-11 18:43 -0700
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 21:06 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <none-ya@beez-waxes.com> - 2022-11-11 20:21 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 23:35 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 09:15 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 14:31 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 08:35 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 09:58 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 15:16 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 10:41 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 15:52 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 11:09 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-11-12 16:42 +0000
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 11:04 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 12:07 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 09:27 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 10:46 -0500
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-11-12 10:02 -0600
Re: Simulating halt decider applied to a simpler input Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-11-12 11:14 -0500
csiph-web